History
  • No items yet
midpage
338 S.W.3d 863
Mo. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Loyd was driving a 1995 black Suburban on Oct 21, 2008 when Officer Nolan ran the plate and learned via MULES there was an outstanding warrant for Loyd; Loyd claimed no license and was arrested after confirming his license was revoked.
  • At 11:29 p.m. on Nov 24, 2008, the same Suburban was stopped again after another plate check revealed an outstanding warrant for Loyd; Loyd was again arrested after verification of revocation.
  • The owner sat in the passenger seat and nine others were in the rear; Loyd was charged with two counts of driving while revoked, a Class A misdemeanor.
  • Loyd moved to suppress the evidence from both stops; the trial court denied the motion; Loyd waived a jury and the court heard suppression testimony instead of trial testimony.
  • The trial court found Loyd guilty on both counts and sentenced him to 180 days on each count, with sentences suspended and Loyd placed on two years’ probation.
  • On appeal, Loyd contends the stops were unlawful because Nolan lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause to run the license-plate check or to stop Loyd.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the license-plate check a Fourth Amendment search? Loyd argues the plate check violated Fourth Amendment rights. Loyd contends the check was an unreasonable search; it also implicates Article I, § 15. The check is not a Fourth Amendment search.
Did the MULES information provide reasonable suspicion to stop the Suburban? Loyd asserts no reasonable suspicion since the vehicle may not be Loyd's. State contends the warrant tied to the plate, via prior stops, gave reasonable suspicion to investigate. Yes; the stops were supported by reasonable suspicion.

Key Cases Cited

  • Diaz-Castaneda v. United States, 494 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007) (license plate checks do not constitute searches)
  • Ellison, 462 F.3d 557 (6th Cir. 2006) (license plate checks generally not searches)
  • Dickson v. State, 252 S.W.3d 216 (Mo. App. E.D.2008) (outstanding warrant associated with plate supports stop)
  • Johnson v. State, 316 S.W.3d 390 (Mo. App. W.D.2010) ( Terry stop reasonable suspicion standard)
  • State v. Pike, 162 S.W.3d 464 (Mo. banc 2005) (framework for reviewing suppression rulings; de novo on Fourth Amendment questions)
  • State v. Milliorn, 794 S.W.2d 181 (Mo. banc 1990) (standard for reviewing suppression rulings)
  • State v. Damask, 936 S.W.2d 565 (Mo. banc 1996) (Fourth Amendment protections in Missouri)
  • New York v. Class, 475 U.S. 106 (1986) (VIN visibility and privacy expectations discussed by Diaz-Castaneda)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Loyd
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 12, 2011
Citations: 338 S.W.3d 863; 2011 WL 1363814; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 477; WD 71836, WD 71837
Docket Number: WD 71836, WD 71837
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
Log In