State v. Lovelady
2014 Mo. LEXIS 146
| Mo. | 2014Background
- Officers saw Lovelady riding a bicycle in circles late at night in a high-crime area; he waved and said, “They went that way,” while pointing down the street.
- Officer Smith observed what appeared to be a handgun in Lovelady’s waistband; officers stopped, drew firearms, ordered him to the ground, handcuffed him, and escorted him to the patrol car.
- The officers examined the object and determined it was an Airsoft toy gun; during the encounter they believed Lovelady appeared intoxicated and he gave no explanation for his earlier comment.
- While detained, officers ran a warrant check; about five minutes after the stop the check returned a pickup order, they arrested Lovelady, and a search incident to arrest revealed cocaine base and a knife.
- Lovelady moved to suppress the drugs as fruit of an unlawful detention; the trial court denied suppression, convicted him after a bench trial, and the Missouri Supreme Court affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether officers had reasonable suspicion to continue detention after learning the gun was a toy | Continued detention lacked reasonable suspicion once toy gun discovered; sole basis for stop evaporated | Totality of circumstances (toy gun’s realistic appearance, late-night behavior, circling, pointing, intoxication, high-crime area) supported continued suspicion to run warrant check | Court held reasonable suspicion persisted; detention for warrant check was lawful |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Grayson, 336 S.W.3d 138 (Mo. banc 2011) (standard for reviewing suppression ruling and Fourth Amendment analysis)
- Pike v. State, 162 S.W.3d 464 (Mo. banc 2005) (reasonable suspicion less than probable cause)
- State v. Goff, 129 S.W.3d 857 (Mo. banc 2004) (deference to trial court fact findings and credibility)
- State v. Norfolk, 366 S.W.3d 528 (Mo. banc 2012) (reasonable suspicion reviewed de novo)
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (Terry stop framework permitting brief investigatory detention on reasonable suspicion)
- State v. Waldrup, 331 S.W.3d 668 (Mo. banc 2011) (applying Terry in Missouri context)
- State v. Deck, 994 S.W.2d 527 (Mo. banc 1999) (Terry stop must remain based on reasonable suspicion)
- State v. Mack, 66 S.W.3d 706 (Mo. banc 2002) (reasonable suspicion requires specific and articulable facts)
- United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002) (totality-of-circumstances and officer training inferences)
- United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1 (1989) (innocent conduct may contribute to reasonable suspicion in context)
- Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. 463 (1985) (objective assessment of officer's actions governs Fourth Amendment review)
