State v. Lorenzo
335 P.3d 821
Or.2014Background
- The Court considers whether evidence found during a voluntary consent search must be suppressed when consent followed an unlawful police entry into the home.
- An officer reached inside the apartment and knocked on the bedroom door, pursuing welfare concerns after a 9-1-1 call.
- The Court of Appeals held the entry unlawful and suppressed the later search under the Hall exploitation framework.
- The Supreme Court adopts the Unger framework for exploitation, focusing on voluntariness, the unlawfulness’ nature, proximity, intervening/mitigating factors, and whether taint was purged.
- The Court finds the unlawful entry was brief and limited, no immediate incriminating information was obtained prior to consent, and defendant voluntarily consented.
- Therefore, the evidence from the consent search is admissible and the Court reverses the Court of Appeals; trial court’s ruling affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether consent was tainted by exploitation of unlawful entry | Lorenzo argues taint from illegality compelled suppression | Lorenzo contends consent was voluntary and not exploitation-driven | Consent not the product of exploitation; evidence admissible |
| Whether the unlawful entry violated Article I, section 9 and affected consent | Lorenzo asserts violation tainted subsequent consent | Consent still voluntary despite unlawful entry | Unlawful entry did not meaningfully taint consent under totality of circumstances |
| Whether mitigating factors would purge the taint | Unger suggests possible purging via intervening factors | Mitigating factors absent or insufficient to purge taint | No mitigating/intervening factors necessary to suppress; but taint not established |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Hall, 339 Or 7 (2005) (exploitations analysis revised; burden on state to show voluntariness)
- State v. Unger, 356 Or 59 (2014) (redefines exploitation; totality of circumstances; purpose and flagrancy considered)
- State v. Musser, 356 Or 148 (2014) (exploitation after unlawful stop; suppression warranted)
- State v. Hemenway, 353 Or 129 (2013) (modifies exploitation framework; warnings encouraged)
- State v. Lorenzo, 252 Or App 263 (2012) (Court of Appeals decision on emergency aid and link to taint)
- State v. Unger, 356 Or 59 (2014) (describes limited intrusion factors and significance of taint)
