midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2023 Ohio 257
Ohio Ct. App.
2023
Read the full case

Background

  • Lopez-Cruz was indicted on seven counts (including multiple sexual offenses) and pleaded guilty to one count of first-degree rape of a child under 13 based on conduct occurring Feb. 16, 2005–Oct. 19, 2007 in Butler County (hallway of a residence).
  • Plea specifically admitted rape in Count 3; other counts were resolved by the plea agreement.
  • At sentencing the trial court imposed the maximum 10-year prison term (with 295 days credit), designated Lopez-Cruz a sexual predator, and notified him of a mandatory five-year postrelease control term.
  • The trial court stated it had considered the purposes and principles of sentencing (R.C. 2929.11) and balanced the seriousness and recidivism factors (R.C. 2929.12).
  • Lopez-Cruz appealed, arguing (1) the record did not support the maximum sentence and the appellate court should independently review R.C. 2929.11/2929.12 findings under R.C. 2953.08(G)(2), and (2) the 10-year sentence is cruel and unusual punishment.

Issues

Issue Lopez-Cruz's Argument State's Argument Held
Whether an appellate court may independently reweigh trial court findings under R.C. 2929.11/2929.12 using R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) Appellant contends R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) permits independent review and the record does not support the maximum sentence Trial court argues R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) does not allow independent reweighing of sentencing findings; sentencing review is limited Court held R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) does not permit independent appellate reweighing of R.C. 2929.11/2929.12 findings; declined to substitute its judgment for the trial court
Whether the 10-year sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment Appellant contends the maximum term is excessive/disproportionate to the offense State argues sentence is within statutory limits and not constitutionally excessive given the nature of the offense Court held the 10-year sentence is within statutory limits and not cruel and unusual punishment; it does not shock the moral sense of the community

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Jones, 163 Ohio St.3d 242 (2020) (R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) does not authorize appellate courts to independently reweigh sentencing findings under R.C. 2929.11/2929.12)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Lopez-Cruz
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 30, 2023
Citations: 2023 Ohio 257; CA2022-07-068
Docket Number: CA2022-07-068
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In