midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
2025 Ohio 1654
Ohio Ct. App.
2025
Read the full case

Background

  • John W. Long was indicted in two separate cases for sexually assaulting minor victims at two business locations, one in Independence, Ohio, and another in Shaker Heights, Ohio.
  • The incidents in Shaker Heights occurred after Long had already been indicted for the Independence offenses.
  • Long pleaded guilty to several counts of gross sexual imposition and a count of sexual battery after a motion for joinder was granted, and the remaining charges were nolled.
  • The trial court imposed consecutive sentences across both cases totaling 12 years, citing public protection and proportionality, and designated Long as a Tier III sexual offender.
  • Long appealed, challenging only the consecutive sentencing for the Independence case, arguing the findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) were unsupported by the record.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether imposition of consecutive sentences in the Independence case complied with R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) Consecutive sentences are justified; statutory findings made Finding that offense was committed "while awaiting trial" unsupported for Independence case Trial court's findings were sufficiently supported by the record; judgment affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Bonnell, 2014-Ohio-3177 (Ohio 2014) (sentencing court must make statutory findings but need not state reasons at sentencing)
  • State v. Hamrick, 2024-Ohio-5101 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024) (discussing sufficiency of findings under R.C. 2929.14 for consecutive sentences)
  • State v. Alexander, 2013-Ohio-1987 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013) (multiple offenses can be across different cases for purposes of consecutive sentencing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Long
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 8, 2025
Citations: 2025 Ohio 1654; 113805 & 113806
Docket Number: 113805 & 113806
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In