History
  • No items yet
midpage
727 S.E.2d 422
S.C.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Liverman convicted of two counts of murder and sentenced to life; conviction affirmed on appeal.
  • Petitioner challenged trial court’s handling of a Neil v. Biggers pretrial identification issue involving Tyrone Smith.
  • Show-up identification was police-arranged and allegedly unduly suggestive.
  • McLeod (1973) had held no Neil v. Biggers hearing was necessary when the witness knew the defendant.
  • Perry v. New Hampshire (2012) held due process requires screening identifications obtained under state action; Perry overruled McLeod’s bright-line rule.
  • Trial court conducted a limited pretrial hearing and the trial proceeded with Tyrone’s identification and related testimony without a full Biggers hearing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a full Neil v. Biggers hearing was required Liverman argues the court erred by not holding a full Biggers hearing. State relies on McLeod as controlling and opposes a full hearing. Harmless error.
Effect of Perry on McLeod and need for hearing Liverman contends Perry requires a pretrial reliability inquiry. State maintains McLeod remains valid. McLeod overruled; Neil hearing required, but error harmless.
Admissibility of Tyrone's in-court ID given show-up and prior knowledge Liverman asserts show-up tainted identification, undermining independent origin. State argues prior acquaintance gives independent origin. In-court ID admissible; independent origin shown.
Harmlessness of the pretrial error Liverman argues the error affected verdict. State contends overall strength of case renders error harmless. Error deemed harmless in view of record.

Key Cases Cited

  • Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 (1972) (due-process framework for unreliable identifications)
  • Perry v. New Hampshire, 132 S. Ct. 736 (2012) (limits screening to identifications by state action; reaffirms need for pretrial review in such cases)
  • McLeod, 260 S.C. 445, 196 S.E.2d 645 (1973) (pretrial hearing not required when witness knows the defendant (court overruled by Perry))
  • State v. Ramsey, 345 S.C. 607, 550 S.E.2d 294 (2001) (in-camera hearing to assess independent origin of in-court ID)
  • State v. Byers, 392 S.C. 438, 710 S.E.2d 55 (2011) (harmless error framework and factors for evaluating impact of evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Liverman
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Jun 6, 2012
Citations: 727 S.E.2d 422; 398 S.C. 130; 2012 S.C. LEXIS 114; 2012 WL 2018015; No. 27130
Docket Number: No. 27130
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
Log In