midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2018 Ohio 1382
Ohio Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Daniel Littlepage pled guilty to aggravated murder in January 2014 and was convicted.
  • He exhausted direct appeal and prior postconviction challenges before 2016.
  • In March 2016 Littlepage filed an Application for DNA Testing under R.C. 2953.71–.81 seeking testing of boots, clothes, skin, and a gun shell from the crime scene.
  • He later filed a Motion to Compel the Hamilton County Prosecutor to process and perform the requested DNA testing.
  • The common pleas court denied the application and motion, finding the request nonspecific, that prior DNA testing had occurred at trial, that DNA testing would not be outcome-determinative, and that Littlepage had pleaded guilty.
  • The court of appeals affirmed, holding Littlepage was ineligible for relief under the DNA-testing statutes because his conviction followed a guilty plea.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a postconviction DNA-testing application under R.C. 2953.71–.81 is available to a defendant who pleaded guilty State: Statute excludes applicants who pleaded guilty; court properly denied application Littlepage: Sought testing of specified physical evidence and asked court to compel testing despite guilty plea Court: Denied—statute bars applicants who pleaded guilty; court correctly overruled motion to compel

Key Cases Cited

(No cited authorities in the opinion have official reporter citations suitable for this list.)

Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Littlepage
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 13, 2018
Citations: 2018 Ohio 1382; C-160918
Docket Number: C-160918
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In