History
  • No items yet
midpage
280 P.3d 1072
Utah Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Little was convicted of possession of a controlled substance (3rd degree) and possession of drug paraphernalia (class B misdemeanor).
  • The convictions followed denial of his motion to suppress evidence found in his truck after police detained him near a Target in Riverdale, Utah.
  • Officers developed reasonable suspicion based on loss prevention notes that Little and a companion acted suspiciously and potentially shoplifted, though no merchandise was observed.
  • Little provided inconsistent explanations for his arrival; information from a third person (Mother) suggested other involvement and arrival by truck, not bus.
  • Police detained Little for about twenty minutes while they pursued the possibility that stolen merchandise was in the truck, eventually discovering marijuana and a pipe inside the truck.
  • The trial court denied suppression, and the Utah Court of Appeals affirmed, concluding the detention was justified and did not exceed permissible bounds.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the initial detention supported by reasonable suspicion? Little Little Yes; detention supported by reasonable suspicion
Did the detention de-escalate to a level-one encounter when told to leave? Little Little Yes; it de-escalated to a consensual encounter
Should the Utah Constitution be read to impose a bright-line limit on detention length? Little Little No; no bright-line rule adopted

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Brake, 103 P.3d 699 (Utah Supreme Court, 2004) (establishes standards for reviewing suppression rulings and law-of-the-case treatment)
  • State v. Markland, 112 P.3d 507 (Utah Supreme Court, 2005) (reasonable suspicion standard for detentions)
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1968) (detention based on reasonable suspicion; scope limited by investigation)
  • State v. Beach, 47 P.3d 932 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2002) (continued questioning within the scope of reasonable suspicion)
  • City of St. George v. Carter, 945 P.2d 165 (Utah Court of Appeals, 1997) (detention justification where observations remain within reasonable suspicion)
  • Levin v. State, 101 P.3d 846 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2004) (time considerations in investigative detention involving multiple suspects)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Little
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: Jun 14, 2012
Citations: 280 P.3d 1072; 710 Utah Adv. Rep. 58; 2012 WL 2138343; 2012 UT App 168; 2012 Utah App. LEXIS 175; 20100885-CA
Docket Number: 20100885-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Little, 280 P.3d 1072