State v. Lee
399 S.C. 521
S.C. Ct. App.2012Background
- Lee is charged with CSC with a minor, lewd act, and two unlawful neglect counts, based on Victim's account of events in Lee's home.
- Victim resided with Lee and Buie until mid-2007; she reported alleged touching, sexual activity, and drug use at Lee's home.
- Arrest warrants issued in 2008; Marshals located Buie in a camper and Lee in Sumter, SC.
- During trial, State admitted 25 graphic images from a digital camera but published only Exhibits 149 and 150.
- Trial court admitted the two photographs; Lee was convicted on all counts and sentenced to concurrent terms; on appeal, court reversed and remanded for the photos issue.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Admissibility of sexually graphic photographs under Rule 403 | Lee argues photos were unduly prejudicial, irrelevant, and cumulative. | State asserts photos corroborate Victim's testimony and are probative. | Admission reversed; highly prejudicial and improper; remand. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Kirton, 381 S.C. 7 (Ct. App. 2008) (appellate review of factual findings)
- State v. Preslar, 364 S.C. 466 (Ct. App. 2005) (factual sufficiency standard)
- State v. Wilson, 345 S.C. 1 (Ct. App. 2001) (standard for evidentiary rulings)
- State v. Mattison, 352 S.C. 577 (Ct. App. 2003) (evidence review framework)
- State v. Saltz, 346 S.C. 114 (Ct. App. 2001) (trial court discretion in evidence rulings)
- State v. Hamilton, 344 S.C. 344 (Ct. App. 2001) (abuse of discretion standard)
- State v. Collins, 398 S.C. 197 (Ct. App. 2012) (probative value vs. unfair prejudice analysis)
- State v. Gilchrist, 329 S.C. 621 (Ct. App. 1998) (unfair prejudice concept)
- State v. Holder, 382 S.C. 278 (2009) (unfair prejudice in photographs)
- State v. White, 372 S.C. 364 (Ct. App. 2007) (prejudice evaluation context)
- State v. Mitchell, 286 S.C. 572 (1985) (harmless error standard)
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.C. 598 (1999) (dispositive ruling may resolve appeal)
