midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
526 S.W.3d 1
Ark.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • On May 19, 2015, Ledwell’s vehicle crossed the center line and caused a head-on collision that killed four occupants; blood and pills indicated possible impairment.
  • On May 12–16, 2016, a probable-cause affidavit and an arrest warrant were prepared and the Hot Spring County Circuit Court found probable cause and issued a bench warrant (May 16, 2016).
  • The warrant was served when Ledwell surrendered on June 2, 2016; a criminal information charging four counts of negligent homicide was filed June 6, 2016.
  • Ledwell moved to dismiss (Oct. 2016), arguing the one-year statute of limitations for misdemeanors had expired because the information was filed more than one year after the offense.
  • The circuit court granted the motion, holding subsection (f) of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-1-109 requires a charging instrument be filed within the limitations period; the State appealed.
  • The Supreme Court of Arkansas considered whether a prosecution is "commenced" for statute-of-limitations purposes when an arrest warrant is issued based on an information or similar charging instrument, even if the instrument is not yet filed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a misdemeanor prosecution is "commenced" under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-1-109(f) only when the charging instrument is filed Ledwell: prosecution not commenced until the information was filed (June 6, 2016); filing occurred after one-year limitations period, so charges time-barred State: prosecution commenced when an arrest warrant was issued (May 16, 2016) based on the information/affidavit; no requirement that the charging instrument be filed within limitations period Court reversed: subsection (f) is plain — a prosecution commences when an arrest warrant or other process is issued based on an indictment, information, or other charging instrument; filing is not required within the limitations period

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Pittman, 360 Ark. 273 (court explained limits on State appeals and standards for review)
  • Clark v. State, 2012 Ark. App. 496 (held misdemeanor prosecution began on date arrest warrant issued, not on filing date)
  • State v. Coble, 487 S.W.3d 370 (2016) (accepted State appeal on statutory-interpretation ground)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Ledwell
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Sep 21, 2017
Citations: 526 S.W.3d 1; 2017 Ark. LEXIS 216; 2017 Ark. 252; CR-17-94
Docket Number: CR-17-94
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
Log In
    State v. Ledwell, 526 S.W.3d 1