History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Lawhorn
2012 Ohio 253
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Joseph Lawhorn was convicted by a jury of domestic violence, a first degree misdemeanor under R.C. 2919.25.
  • The incident occurred on November 22, 2010, involving Lawhorn and his wife Ashlea Lawhorn.
  • Ashlea testified that Lawhorn pulled her from a car, threw her to the ground, choked her, and took her phone during a dispute over a computer.
  • Deputy Rose observed injuries on Ashlea and photographs of those injuries were admitted at trial.
  • Lawhorn sought to have his mother testify about surrounding circumstances; the State objected and the trial court excluded the witness.
  • Lawhorn was sentenced to two years of community control, 15 days in jail, and domestic-violence program participation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether exclusion of a defense witness was proper. Lawhorn argues the mother should testify about the incident circumstances. State contends the witness was undisclosed and violated Crim.R. 16, justifying exclusion. Exclusion upheld; no abuse of discretion given discovery violation and lack of prejudice to defense.

Key Cases Cited

  • City of Lakewood v. Papadelis, 32 Ohio St.3d 1 (Ohio 1987) (sanctions for discovery violations depend on circumstances and least severe appropriate)
  • State v. Warren, 2004-Ohio-5599 (Ohio App. 2004) (discovery rules govern witness disclosure and sanctions)
  • State v. Sinkfield, 2001-Ohio-1835 (Ohio App. 2001) (trial court discretion in imposing discovery sanctions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Lawhorn
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 13, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 253
Docket Number: 11CA3223
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.