902 N.W.2d 739
N.D.2017Background
- On Sept. 6, 2016, officers stopped a Dodge Charger after an officer in an unmarked car observed it traveling the wrong way in a lane in Minot, ND.
- During the stop officers observed in plain view what they believed to be crack cocaine and a rolled-up bill (snort tube) on the passenger side; Bambenek directed Lark to exit, handcuffed him, read Miranda, and officers searched him.
- Search of Lark found two cell phones, about $8,400 cash, and a rolled-up dollar bill with a burn mark. Bambenek searched the vehicle and found a third phone, a letter with another person’s birth certificate, and other collectibles.
- Field narcotics tests were inconclusive ~24 minutes into the stop; officers continued the vehicle search and ~51 minutes into the stop found Suboxone hidden in the headliner; Lark was arrested for possession with intent to deliver.
- Lark moved to suppress; the district court granted the motion concluding probable cause ceased after the inconclusive field test. The State appealed and the Supreme Court reversed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (State) | Defendant's Argument (Lark) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the warrantless search of the vehicle was justified under the automobile exception | The automobile exception applied because officers observed apparent crack cocaine and paraphernalia in plain view, creating probable cause to search the vehicle | The search exceeded Fourth Amendment limits, particularly after the field test was inconclusive | Search was lawful under the automobile exception — probable cause existed based on the totality of circumstances |
| Whether an inconclusive field drug test eliminated probable cause and required suppression of later-found evidence | The inconclusive field test did not negate probable cause when viewed with all other factors (cash, multiple phones, rolled bills, visible suspected drugs) | The inconclusive test undermined the officers’ probable cause and the continued search/length of detention was unlawful | The inconclusive test did not eliminate probable cause; the district court erred in treating it as dispositive |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Doohen, 2006 ND 239, 724 N.W.2d 158 (automobile exception and probable cause assessed under totality of circumstances)
- State v. Gregg, 2000 ND 154, 615 N.W.2d 515 (automobile-exception search validated where contraband was observable in vehicle)
- State v. Wacht, 2013 ND 126, 833 N.W.2d 455 (probable cause is assessed as the laminated total of information)
- State v. Washington, 2007 ND 138, 737 N.W.2d 382 (officer’s subjective belief is irrelevant to objective probable-cause analysis)
- State v. Roth, 2006 ND 106, 713 N.W.2d 513 (totality-of-circumstances test for probable cause)
