State v. Lance Tyrell Taylor
373 P.3d 699
Idaho2016Background
- Taylor pleaded guilty to grand theft in January 2013; the court suspended a 10-year sentence and placed him on ten years’ probation beginning March 26, 2013, requiring successful enrollment and completion of Ada County Drug Court.
- Taylor entered drug court March 27, 2013, and was intermittently incarcerated during the program for sanctions and after absconding; he remained in custody from his February 26, 2014 arrest until resentencing on June 12, 2014.
- The district court credited 292 days of pre-judgment custody but denied credit for some jail time served while Taylor participated in drug court, treating that incarceration as sanctions or discretionary probation conditions.
- Taylor filed motions seeking additional credit for multiple incarceration periods; the district court awarded credit for periods it characterized as pre-sentence, post-arrest (bench-warrant), and post-violation custody, but denied credit for incarceration occurring as drug-court sanctions.
- On appeal Taylor argued (1) that 2015 amendments to Idaho’s credit statutes should be applied retroactively to award him credit, and (2) alternatively that under the pre-amendment statutes and his written probation terms he did not agree to discretionary jail time, so drug-court jail time must be credited against his sentence.
Issues
| Issue | Taylor's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Are 2015 amendments to Idaho’s credit statutes retroactive? | Amendments should be applied retroactively to give credit for drug-court custody. | Amendments are not retroactive. | Not retroactive; pre-amendment law governs. |
| Is incarceration during drug court creditable against sentence under pre-amendment law? | Time in jail while in drug court is pre-judgment/incarceration attributable to the offense and must be credited; he did not voluntarily agree to discretionary jail as a probation condition. | Time served as drug-court sanctions is discretionary/condition of probation and not creditable. | Reversed district court: drug-court incarceration is creditable. |
| Did Taylor’s written probation order authorize discretionary jail time as a condition of probation? | Probation terms did not include mandatory discretionary incarceration; condition expressly preserved credit for time not imposed as condition of probation. | Drug-court participation implicitly allowed sanctions including jail. | Probation order did not authorize incarceration as a condition; thus custody must be credited. |
| Remedy / next step | Award credit and determine total days to apply against sentence. | If some periods are discretionary, no credit for those. | Affirmed credit for other periods; reversed denial for drug-court period; remand to calculate total days. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Buys, 129 Idaho 122, 922 P.2d 419 (interpreting when probation-ordered jail is voluntary and not creditable)
- State v. Banks, 121 Idaho 608, 826 P.2d 1320 (defendant may decline probation terms; probation conditions control credit analysis)
- State v. Dunlap, 155 Idaho 345, 313 P.3d 1 (statutory interpretation principles)
- State v. Owens, 158 Idaho 1, 343 P.3d 30 (statutory interpretation; review standards)
- State v. Vasquez, 142 Idaho 67, 122 P.3d 1167 (credit-for-time-served is reviewed as a question of law)
