State v. LaGrange
279 P.3d 105
Kan.2012Background
- LaGrange was convicted in 1994 of aggravated battery and sentenced to prison.
- He was released from prison on the aggravated battery sentence in 2004.
- In 2007 he was charged with criminal possession of a firearm under K.S.A. 21-4204(a)(4)(A).
- The district court held the 10-year firearm ban began on his 2004 release date; LaGrange argued it began on the 1994 conviction date.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s interpretation.
- The Kansas Supreme Court granted review to resolve the interpretive questions about the statute.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| When does the 10-year ban start under 21-4204(a)(4)(A)? | LaGrange argues the ban runs from the 1994 conviction date. | LaGrange contends the 10-year period begins at release from prison, not conviction. | Ban starts at prison release date; not from conviction. |
| What is the meaning of the 'out-of-state felony' and 'released from imprisonment' phrases? | Out-of-state and listed felonies should be treated differently; release from prison applies only to listed felonies. | The phrases together cover both listed and substantially similar out-of-state felonies, staying the clock during imprisonment. | The statute ties both listed Kansas felonies and substantially similar out-of-state felonies to the 10-year period, with the clock starting on release from prison or conviction accordingly. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Arnett, 290 Kan. 41 (2010) (statutory interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo)
- State v. Urban, 291 Kan. 214 (2010) (interpretation starts with plain language and legislative intent)
- State v. Jackson, 291 Kan. 34 (2010) (rule of lenity limited by sensible legislative design)
- State v. Trautloff, 289 Kan. 793 (2009) (recognizes presumption against useless or meaningless statutes)
