History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Kwambana
2017 Ohio 1406
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Kwambana and an accomplice robbed a Golden Corral in Clermont County, restraining four employees at gunpoint and using zip ties; they stole money and were arrested.
  • Indicted for one count of aggravated burglary and four counts of kidnapping; each kidnapping count included firearm specifications.
  • Plea agreement: Kwambana pleaded guilty to the four kidnapping counts; the state dismissed the aggravated burglary charge and all firearm specifications. The trial court accepted the plea and sentenced him to 32 years.
  • On direct appeal, this court affirmed Kwambana’s convictions and sentence.
  • After the direct appeal decision, Kwambana moved in the trial court to withdraw his guilty plea, alleging ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel for failing to advise about merger and for not filing a presentence motion to withdraw the plea.
  • The trial court denied the motion; Kwambana appealed that denial to this court.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court had jurisdiction to decide Kwambana’s post‑appeal motion to withdraw his guilty plea State: Trial court lacked jurisdiction to act after the appellate court affirmed the conviction absent a remand from a higher court Kwambana: Trial court could rule on his motion alleging ineffective assistance that affected the plea’s validity Court: Dismissed appeal for lack of jurisdiction – trial court was without power to decide the motion after the direct appeal affirmed the judgment
Whether Kwambana’s ineffective-assistance claims could be raised via the trial-court motion after appeal State: Claims were time‑barred under App.R. 26(B) and should have been raised within 90 days via a 26(B) motion Kwambana: Argued appellate and trial counsel were ineffective for failing to raise merger/plea withdrawal issues Court: Not reached on the merits because the trial court’s post‑appeal ruling was void for lack of jurisdiction

Key Cases Cited

  • State ex rel. Special Prosecutors v. Judges, 55 Ohio St.2d 94 (trial court lacks power to vacate a judgment affirmed on appeal)
  • State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94 (2007) (a void judgment is a nullity and leaves parties as if no judgment occurred)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Kwambana
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 17, 2017
Citation: 2017 Ohio 1406
Docket Number: CA2016-08-060
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.