midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
426 P.3d 674
Or. Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant pistol‑whipped the victim on July 20, 2015, striking the victim in the head multiple times; ambulance transport and hospital treatment followed.
  • Medical records showed a 2‑inch full‑thickness laceration on the left side of the victim’s head closed with five staples; staples removed eight days later.
  • At trial (bench trial, waived jury) the victim testified more than six months after the assault that he had a scalp scar visible when he cut his hair short and showed the scar to the court.
  • Defendant was convicted of second‑degree assault and menacing; sentencing triggered a mandatory minimum of 70 months unless eligible for a downward departure under ORS 137.712.
  • The sole contested eligibility issue for departure was whether the victim suffered a “significant physical injury,” defined to include protracted disfigurement.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the victim suffered a "significant physical injury" under ORS 137.712(2)(b)(B) State: the visible scar more than six months after assault establishes a protracted disfigurement and thus significant physical injury Defendant: record does not show how visible the scar was or that it will be permanent or persist for a significant period Court: affirmed; scar visible >6 months supports finding of protracted disfigurement and thus significant physical injury

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Alvarez, 240 Or. App. 167 (Or. Ct. App. 2010) (scar on scalp visible five months after assault qualifies as protracted disfigurement/serious physical injury)
  • State v. Brewer, 260 Or. App. 607 (Or. Ct. App. 2014) (defendant bears burden to prove eligibility for downward departure under ORS 137.712)
  • State v. Cloutier, 351 Or. 68 (Or. 2011) (legislative use of consistent terms across related statutes presumed)
  • Lambert v. Palmateer, 187 Or. App. 528 (Or. Ct. App. 2003) (demonstrative evidence conveys firsthand impression to trier of fact)
  • State v. Campbell, 266 Or. App. 116 (Or. Ct. App. 2014) (scar visible months after injury can support finding of protracted disfigurement)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Kinsey
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Aug 1, 2018
Citations: 426 P.3d 674; 293 Or. App. 208; A161875 (Control); A161876
Docket Number: A161875 (Control); A161876
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In