midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2012 Ohio 4070
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Indicted in 2004 on 62 counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor under R.C. 2907.32(1)(A)(1) and (5).
  • Convicted after a jury trial on January 25, 2005; sentenced March 7, 2005 to 36.5 years and classified as a sexual predator/habitual sexual offender.
  • This court affirmed convictions but remanded for resentencing to comply with R.C. 2929.14(E)(4); resentencing occurred March 8, 2006 to the same term.
  • Appellant filed multiple postconviction and resentencing motions from 2008 through 2011; trial court denied each, and this court affirmed those denials.
  • On July 14, 2011, appellant filed another motion for resentencing; the trial court denied it February 15, 2012; this appeal followed.
  • Assignments of error challenge the denial of resentencing, alleging due process/equal protection violations, void sentence, and failure to notify about mandatory aspects of sentencing and registration.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court erred in denying resentencing King contends due process and equal protection violations; sentence void State asserts no error; properly denied postconviction relief Denied; court reaffirmed denial of the motion for resentencing
Whether the current sentence is void or unreasonable King argues sentence remains void after remand State maintains HB 86 not retroactive and remand complied Denied; HB 86 not retroactive and remand completed before HB 86
Whether the court failed to notify mandatory aspects at resentencing King claims lack of notification of mandatory sentencing consequences State maintains proper procedure followed Denied; no reversible error shown
Whether the court failed to notify about registration duties without a sexual predator hearing King asserts due process lacking for registration obligations State argues proceedings and duties correctly imposed Denied; no error shown

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Reynolds, 79 Ohio St.3d 158 (Ohio Supreme Court 1997) (postconviction review standard for petitions after direct appeal)
  • State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St.2d 175 (Ohio Supreme Court 1967) (res judicata applies to postconviction relief petitions)
  • State v. Fields, 2011-Ohio-6044 (Ohio App. 2011) (HB 86 not retroactive to resentencing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. King
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 4, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 4070; CT12-0018
Docket Number: CT12-0018
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In