History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Kind
2018 Ohio 3309
Ohio Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • In Feb 2017, Raymond Carter was shot multiple times after leaving a convenience store; he survived and a bullet fragment was recovered.
  • Carter identified George Casanova Kind as the shooter in a hospital photo lineup and at trial; Carter testified he saw Kind holding a handgun before being shot.
  • Kind was indicted on attempted murder, felonious assault counts (with firearm and repeat offender specifications), and having weapons while under disability; the jury acquitted him on the counts submitted to it.
  • The repeat offender specifications, prior conviction notices, and the weapons-under-disability count were tried to the bench; the trial court found Kind guilty of having weapons while under disability and sentenced him to 24 months in prison.
  • Kind appealed, arguing the weapons-under-disability conviction was against the manifest weight of the evidence, challenging eyewitness credibility and pointing to lack of physical evidence and surveillance.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether conviction for having weapons while under disability is against the manifest weight of the evidence State: eyewitness ID (Carter) and related testimony prove Kind knowingly used a firearm while having a prior felony violence conviction Kind: Carter and his brother conspired to misidentify him; lack of physical evidence, surveillance, casings, or recovered weapon undermines ID Court: Affirmed — conviction is not against manifest weight; trial court (bench) crediting eyewitness testimony was reasonable

Key Cases Cited

  • Thompkins v. Ohio, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (1997) (defines manifest-weight standard and appellate role as a ‘thirteenth juror’)
  • Tibbs v. Florida, 457 U.S. 31 (1982) (appellate court may disagree with factfinder’s resolution of conflicting testimony)
  • State v. Martin, 20 Ohio App.3d 172 (1984) (factors for weighing evidence and reversing on manifest-weight grounds)
  • State v. DeHass, 10 Ohio St.2d 230 (1967) (credibility and weight of evidence are for the trier of fact)
  • State v. Robinson, 162 Ohio St. 486 (1956) (sufficiency and weight are distinct reviews)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Kind
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 16, 2018
Citation: 2018 Ohio 3309
Docket Number: 106413
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.