State v. Kevin Storey
102 A.3d 641
R.I.2014Background
- Defendant Kevin Storey appealed a Superior Court conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon and simple assault and battery.
- Trial evidence included Saleeba’s testimony of choking, head injury, and death threats; hospital records showed no neck injuries.
- Jury found him guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon and simple assault and battery (as a lesser-included offense) but acquitted on the serious bodily injury count.
- Sentence was fifteen years on count 1 (five to serve, ten suspended, with probation) and one year on count 2 (suspended, to be served concurrently).
- Defendant challenged judgments on acquittal/new trial, cross-examination of the victim about custody issues, and the legality of the sentence; the Court decided to affirm.
- Causes were not summarily decided; the Court proceeded to address the issues and affirm the judgment.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judgment of acquittal/new trial standard | Defendant argues lack of evidence supports conviction | Evidence equivocal; no marks on neck; hospital record silent | New-trial standard upheld; evidence supports conviction for dangerous-weapon assault. |
| Cross-examination on custody issues | Custody issues could impeach credibility | Should have cross-examined Saleeba about custody | Trial court did not abuse discretion; custody issue outside jury scope was irrelevant. |
| Sentence legality on direct appeal | Fifteen-year sentence for assault with a dangerous weapon | Sentence potentially illegal; misapplication of verdict | Sentence reviewed as improper here; no extraordinary circumstances; issue not properly before Court. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Lopez, 78 A.3d 773 (R.I. 2013) (hands-only assault with dangerous weapon may support conviction without injuries)
- State v. Zangrilli, 440 A.2d 710 (R.I. 1982) (use of hands as a dangerous weapon if likely to cause substantial harm)
- State v. Adewumi, 966 A.2d 1217 (R.I. 2009) (trial judge may comment on lack of expert proof without shifting burden)
- State v. Pineda, 13 A.3d 623 (R.I. 2011) (new-trial standard; credibility assessment by thirteenth juror)
- State v. Fleck, 81 A.3d 1129 (R.I. 2014) ( Rule 29/33 motions; deferential review for new-trial motion)
- State v. Gaffney, 63 A.3d 888 (R.I. 2013) (standard for reviewing Rule 33 motions; credibility)
- State v. Watkins, 92 A.3d 172 (R.I. 2014) (thirteenth juror concept; credibility and weight of evidence)
- State v. Clay, 79 A.3d 832 (R.I. 2013) (how trial court weighs weight of evidence on new trial)
- State v. Ibrahim, 862 A.2d 787 (R.I. 2004) (direct-appeal sentence review not proper absent extraordinary circumstances)
- State v. Bettencourt, 723 A.2d 1101 (R.I. 1999) (sentence review procedure on direct appeal)
