State v. Kelley
298 Ga. 527
| Ga. | 2016Background
- Georgia Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve whether a trial court may enter judgment and impose sentence on a guilty plea to an uncharged, lesser included offense without State consent.
- The State may withdraw its consent to a negotiated plea if the court intends to reject the State’s recommended sentence and impose a lighter one.
- Terry Kelley was indicted for felony murder; the parties reached a plea to voluntary manslaughter with a 20-year sentence recommendation and cooperation to testify against co-defendants.
- The trial court accepted the plea but later sentenced Kelley to 10 years (5 to serve) and ordered truthful testimony; the court stated it had last say despite the plea.
- The State objected and moved to set aside the judgment; the trial court vacated and resentenced Kelley to 20 years; the Court of Appeals reversed, reinstating the original judgment.
- The Court of Appeals held there was no authority for the State to withdraw its offer when the court intended to sentence less than the State’s recommendation; the Supreme Court reversed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authority to accept lesser plea without State consent | State argues it may withdraw consent when court rejects the negotiated sentence. | Kelley argues trial court cannot accept a reduced plea without State consent. | Trial court cannot accept a guilty plea to a lesser offense without State consent. |
| State's right to withdraw upon deviation from recommendation | State may withdraw consent if court imposes a lighter sentence than agreed. | State should be bound by the negotiated plea despite sentence deviation. | State may withdraw consent and demand a trial if the court rejects the negotiated sentence. |
| Record notice and State's opportunity to withdraw | If the court indicates deviation from the agreement on record, State must object promptly. | State should not be able to preserve a right to trial after notice is given. | State must object on the record before sentencing to preserve withdrawal rights. |
| Judicial discretion vs. prosecutorial control | State's authority to decide charges and sentences is broad, but judge may sentence within law. | Judge should independently determine sentence; prosecutorial control over sentence is limited. | Prosecution has broad charging and sentence-seeking discretion, but judge cannot override consented lesser plea without timely State objection. |
Key Cases Cited
- Kelley v. State, 331 Ga. App. 758 (Ga. App. 2015) (State may withdraw plea when court rejects sentence; appellate discussion on authority)
- State v. Harper, 279 Ga. App. 620 (Ga. App. 2006) (no comparable authority for State to withdraw offer when court deviates from sentence)
- State v. Wooten, 273 Ga. 529 (Ga. 2001) (State authority to decide charges and sentences)
- State v. Dawson, 203 Ga. App. 854 (Ga. App. 1992) (prosecutorial discretion in plea bargaining)
- Stripling v. State, 289 Ga. 370 (Ga. 2011) (trial court may lack authority to accept plea absent State consent when outcome changes)
- State v. Germany, 246 Ga. 455 (Ga. 1980) (requirement to inform defendant of plea rights; prospective rule development)
- Bostic v. State, 184 Ga. App. 509 (Ga. App. 1987) (court cannot accept a non-negotiated plea to an offense other than charged)
