midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2022 Ohio 561
Ohio Ct. App.
2022
Read the full case

Background

  • Trooper Matthew Atwood stopped Clarence Jones’s car after observing dark window tint and a nonworking brake light while following the vehicle.
  • Atwood ordered Jones out of the vehicle, performed a pat-down, and placed him in the patrol cruiser.
  • While speaking with the passenger, Atwood detected the odor of raw marijuana and then announced he would search the vehicle.
  • During the search Atwood located a magnetic box under the car containing a sock with a vacuum-sealed bag holding ~130 grams of cocaine.
  • Jones moved to suppress, arguing the stop lacked reasonable suspicion/probable cause and the officer unlawfully expanded the stop; the trial court denied suppression.
  • Jones pled no contest to cocaine possession, was sentenced to eight years, appealed, and the appellate court affirmed the denial of the suppression motion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (State) Defendant's Argument (Jones) Held
Lawfulness of initial traffic stop Stop was lawful: dark tint and broken brake light provided reasonable suspicion/probable cause to stop Stop lacked reasonable suspicion/probable cause for a tint violation Court upheld the stop — trooper articulated tint and defective brake light, and appellant did not contest the stop at the hearing; either factor justified the stop
Expansion of the stop / search of vehicle After ordering driver out (Mimms/patrol-safety), officer smelled marijuana; odor gave probable cause to search Officer unlawfully expanded the stop; no reasonable suspicion to detain, pat-down, or search; trooper’s odor testimony not credible; dog should have been used Court held ordering driver out and pat-down lawful; odor of raw marijuana (trooper’s credible testimony) supplied probable cause to search; manual search was permissible

Key Cases Cited

  • Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) (traffic stop reasonable if officer has probable cause or reasonable suspicion of violation)
  • Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015) (traffic-stop detention must be limited to mission of stop unless additional reasonable suspicion arises)
  • Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977) (officer may order driver out of vehicle for officer safety)
  • Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323 (2009) (Mimms order justified by safety; officer may conduct limited frisk if suspect may be armed and dangerous)
  • Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005) (traffic stop cannot be prolonged beyond mission absent new reasonable suspicion)
  • United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002) (reasonable-suspicion analysis considers totality of circumstances)
  • Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) (warrantless searches presumptively unreasonable; limited exceptions)
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (officer may detain/ frisk on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and danger)
  • State v. Moore, 90 Ohio St.3d 47 (2000) (in Ohio, qualified officer’s detection of marijuana odor alone provides probable cause to search)
  • State v. Robinette, 80 Ohio St.3d 234 (1997) (continued detention beyond original purpose requires articulable suspicion of additional criminal activity)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Jones
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 18, 2022
Citations: 2022 Ohio 561; 185 N.E.3d 131; 20CA9
Docket Number: 20CA9
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In