State v. Jones
220 N.C. App. 392
| N.C. Ct. App. | 2012Background
- Jones was found guilty of second-degree murder in 2011 for the 2006 death of Sarah Slaton.
- The prosecution originally charged Jones with first-degree murder, triggering a lengthy defense history.
- Multiple lawyers served as appointed and standby counsel as Jones at times proceeded pro se.
- In 2009 Jones moved to represent himself and a mistrial resulted.
- In 2010 Paramore served as standby and then was removed; Gerrans was appointed as new counsel.
- In November 2010 Jones waived counsel, was found competent, and proceeded pro se at retrial, leading to the 2011 conviction and sentence of 300–369 months.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the court erred by not instructing counsel to defer to Jones’s wishes. | Jones argues Ali required deferring to his wishes on trial strategy. | Jones contends counsel should have pursued his theories of misconduct. | No error; counsel were ethically barred from pursuing frivolous claims; trial court did not need to defer. |
| Whether Jones’s waiver of counsel was valid. | Ali-based objections aside, waiver complied with 15A-1242. | Waiver was invalid due to misadvice under Ali. | No error; court complied with 15A-1242 standards and properly accepted the waiver. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Ali, 329 N.C. 394 (1991) (attorney must comply with client’s lawful instructions; frivolous claims not required)
- State v. Tate, 187 N.C.App. 593 (2007) (de novo review of constitutional rights)
