266 P.3d 886
Wash. Ct. App.2011Background
- Jones was charged with unlawful possession of cocaine with intent to deliver within 1,000 feet of a school bus stop route, unlawful possession of oxycodone, and unlawful possession of methadone.
- On November 21, 2007, Tacoma officers stopped Jones for an alleged seat belt violation and observed pills and unlabeled bottles in a door compartment.
- Jones admitted ownership of some pills; he was arrested, Mirandized, and later questioned; he stated he believed Percocet was legal to possess.
- Smith then searched Jones’s person, found a bag containing 19 baggies of a white substance later identified as cocaine, and seized pills in the vehicle.
- A subsequent vehicle search revealed oxycodone and methadone pills in two bottles; forensics confirmed cocaine, oxycodone, and methadone.
- Jones moved to suppress the evidence and statements; the trial court denied the motions; a jury convicted on all counts with a school zone enhancement.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the warrantless vehicle search was unlawful. | Jones argues the search violated both state and federal constitutions. | Jones contends the search was impermissible and not justified by any exception. | The search was unlawful; evidence from the car must be suppressed. |
| Whether open view/seizure doctrine permitted seizure without a warrant. | Jones asserts no lawful seizure under open view. | State relies on open view but seeks to justify seizure without a warrant. | Open view did not justify entry to seize the open-view items; suppression required. |
| Preservation of Fourth Amendment challenge on appeal. | Jones preserved challenge by trial motion to suppress statements and some evidence. | State argues waiver for unchallenged aspects and no new constitutional interpretation to apply retroactively. | Issue not preserved for all theories; majority still suppresses the contested evidence; dissent would affirm. |
| Impact on convictions for oxycodone and methadone. | Admission of these results should stand if search valid. | Illegality of search taints these convictions. | Convictions for oxycodone and methadone reversed; cocaine within school zone affirmed. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Patton, 167 Wash.2d 379, 219 P.3d 651 (2009) (privacy interest in automobiles; open view limits and need for warrant when entering secured area)
- State v. Gibson, 152 Wash.App. 945, 219 P.3d 964 (2009) (open view does not authorize warrantless entry to seize from protected areas)
- State v. Kennedy, 107 Wash.2d 1, 726 P.2d 445 (1986) (open view concept; limitations on warrantless seizure)
- State v. Robinson, 171 Wash.2d 292, 253 P.3d 84 (2011) (new controlling constitutional interpretation; preservation prerequisites for appeal)
- State v. Mierz, 127 Wash.2d 460, 901 P.2d 286 (1995) (preservation of error for suppression challenges)