State v. Johnson
2012 Ohio 1230
Ohio Ct. App.2012Background
- Johnson burglarized Kathy Flayer's residence, left blood and attempted to destroy DNA with cleaners, causing interior damage.
- Johnson stole a firearm from Flayer and burglarized Linda Harris's residence.
- Johnson was on probation for a Montgomery County case at the time of the offenses.
- Johnson pled guilty to all counts and agreed to restitution to Harris, Flayer, and Grange Insurance Company.
- Plea form and plea hearing reflected an agreement to restitution to Grange for interior-repair losses; sentencing imposed seven-year term.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether restitution to a third party is permitted under R.C. 2929.18(A)(1). | Johnson argues Grange is not a victim and thus not eligible. | Johnson notes statutory limits on who may be a payee; he and State reached a plea-based exception. | Restitution to Grange upheld under express plea agreement. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Colon, 185 Ohio App.3d 671 (2010-Ohio-492) (insurance not a proper third-party payee under 2929.18(A)(1))
- State v. Kiser, 2011-Ohio-5551 (2011-Ohio-5551) (bank not a victim; restitution not proper under Kiser’s reasoning)
- State v. Brinson, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 22925, 2009-Ohio-5040 (2009-Ohio-5040) (economic loss may be awarded to another agency that paid victim's losses)
- State v. Bartholomew, 119 Ohio St. 3d 359, 2008-Ohio-4080 (2008-Ohio-4080) (defines victim and scope of restitution)
- State v. Stewart, 3rd Dist. Wyandot No. 16-08-11, 2008-Ohio-5823 (2008-Ohio-5823) (restitution under plea agreement can be upheld)
- State v. Wilson, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 23167, 2010-Ohio-109 (2010-Ohio-109) (sets framework for permissible payees under 2929.18(A)(1))
- State v. Williams, 34 Ohio App.3d 33, 516 N.E.2d 1270 (1986) (abuse of discretion standard for restitution when relationship to loss)
- State v. Naylor, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 24098, 2011-Ohio-960 (2011-Ohio-960) (restitution review framework)
