History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. JM
162 Wash. App. 27
| Wash. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • SRO Fry, a Bellevue Police Department officer, was on duty at Robinswood High School when he observed J.M. holding what appeared to be marijuana near a backpack and detected marijuana odor.
  • Fry seized the marijuana, a vial, and the backpack, handcuffed J.M., and took him to the dean of students.
  • Fry attempted to search J.M.'s locked backpack; he opened it enough to retrieve a few items and later used a key to open the backpack, finding an air pistol.
  • J.M. was charged with carrying a dangerous weapon at school and possession of less than 40 grams of marijuana; suppression motion was denied; adjudication occurred on stipulated facts.
  • The court addressed whether Fry, during a school-related encounter, was a “school official” and whether the search was justified under a reasonable grounds standard rather than probable cause; court held Fry was a school official and the search was constitutional under reasonable grounds.
  • Two McKinnon factors supported reasonableness: recognized prevalence of drugs at the school and the reliability/ probative value of Fry’s observation; absence of explicit age/history/exigent circumstances did not render the search unconstitutional.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Fry was a school official for the school search exception J.M. argues Fry was not a school official State argues Fry acted as a school official Yes; Fry acted as a school official.
Whether there were reasonable grounds to search J.M.'s backpack J.M. contends no exigent circumstances and lack of grounds State argues observed marijuana and locked backpack created reasonable grounds Yes; search supported by reasonable grounds.

Key Cases Cited

  • New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (U.S. Supreme Court 1985) (established school search exception and standard)
  • State v. Slattery, 56 Wash. App. 820 (Wash. Ct. App. 1990) (reasonable grounds analysis for school searches; exigency not always required)
  • State v. B.A.S., 103 Wash. App. 549 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000) (limited by nexus between policy violation and contraband)
  • State v. McKinnon, 88 Wash.2d 75 (Wash. 1977) (school official with reasonable grounds may search without probable cause)
  • State v. Brooks, 43 Wash. App. 560 (Wash. Ct. App. 1986) (McKinnon factors used to assess reasonableness)
  • People v. Dilworth, 169 Ill. 2d 195 (Ill. 1996) (reasonable suspicion standard for school officials} ,{)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. JM
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Washington
Date Published: May 23, 2011
Citation: 162 Wash. App. 27
Docket Number: 64699-1-I
Court Abbreviation: Wash. Ct. App.