History
  • No items yet
midpage
2011 Ohio 2654
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Plea negotiations centered on failure to comply with police officer orders (R.C. 2921.331) with a planned sentence ranging 1–5 years.
  • Defendant Jeffery fled a police signal July 2009; truck stolen in Obetz and involved in high-speed pursuit.
  • Nov. 25, 2009 pretrial on failure-to-comply charge; additional receiving stolen property to be dismissed if he pled guilty to failure-to-comply.
  • Jeffery failed to appear for the December 16, 2009 change-of-plea hearing; separate sentences were imposed in Delaware County (April 7, 2010) and Franklin County (July 21, 2010).
  • August 4, 2010 Jeffery pled guilty to failure-to-comply; sentenced to 1 year, to run concurrently with other out-of-county sentences.
  • October 13, 2010 State appealed, arguing the court should impose a consecutive sentence under R.C. 2921.331(D).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether sentence for failure to comply must run consecutively to other sentences State argues R.C. 2921.331(D) requires consecutive terms. Jeffery’s prior sentences did not permit retroactive consecutive sentencing. Yes; statute mandates consecutive sentencing to other terms.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Clark, 2002-Ohio-3135 (Ohio 2002) (consecutive sentences permissible across separate cases under R.C. 2921.331(D))
  • State v. Spicer, 2010-Ohio-61 (Ohio 2010) (failure-to-comply must run consecutive to any other term per R.C. 2921.331(D))
  • State v. Mooney, 2005-Ohio-5655 (Ohio 2005) (automatic consecutive sentences valid under statute)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Jeffery
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 1, 2011
Citations: 2011 Ohio 2654; 10 CA 120
Docket Number: 10 CA 120
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Jeffery, 2011 Ohio 2654