State v. Jacobs
393 S.C. 584
| S.C. | 2011Background
- Appellant Abel Jacobs pled guilty in January 2010 to first degree burglary among other charges, with the circuit court deferring sentencing on that burglary at the plea hearing.
- Defense urged suspension of the minimum fifteen-year sentence in favor of probation, citing practice of suspending such sentences in other cases.
- The circuit court later ruled that a sentence for first degree burglary is not suspendable under S.C. Code § 24-21-410.
- At sentencing, the court imposed fifteen years for first degree burglary and concurrent sentences on other charges, crediting time served prior to the guilty plea.
- Jacobs appealed, challenging whether the sentence for first degree burglary can be suspended under § 24-21-410.
- The Supreme Court of South Carolina affirmed the circuit court, holding that such sentences may not be suspended because first degree burglary is punishable by life imprisonment.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Can a first degree burglary sentence be suspended under § 24-21-410? | Jacobs: suspendable because statute allows suspension unless death or life imprisonment; burglary not expressly barred. | State: burglary falls within exception for life imprisonment; not suspendable. | Suspension not authorized for crimes punishable by life imprisonment. |
Key Cases Cited
- Hodges v. Rainey, 341 S.C. 79, 533 S.E.2d 578 (2000) (statutory interpretation favors plain meaning)
- Grazia v. S.C. State Plastering, LLC, 390 S.C. 562, 703 S.E.2d 197 (2010) (plain meaning governs statutory construction)
- State v. Mills, 360 S.C. 621, 602 S.E.2d 750 (2004) (penal statutes construed strictly against state)
- State v. Blackmon, 304 S.C. 270, 403 S.E.2d 660 (1991) (strict construction of penal statutes)
- State v. Thomas, 372 S.C. 466, 642 S.E.2d 724 (2007) (absence of express prohibition on suspension implies suspension may be available)
