midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
192 Ohio App. 3d 617
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Indicted Vincent Jackson for multiple offenses including aggravated murder with death-penalty specs, murder, aggravated robbery, felonious assault, tampering with evidence, and weapons under disability.
  • Jackson moved for disclosure of grand jury witness names; trial court granted in part and denied in part, ordering names to be submitted to the court for in camera inspection.
  • State sought leave to appeal the denial of its motion to reconsider; the trial court denied the motion and ordered the state to provide a sealed witness list for in-camera review.
  • This court granted leave to appeal but later determined the grant was improvident, and dismissed the appeal.
  • The central issue was whether the trial court improperly ordered the state to submit the witness list for in-camera sealing and whether the state’s leave to appeal was proper, given the record.
  • The Court ultimately held that leave to appeal was improvidently granted and dismissed the state’s appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal State contends leave proper under 2945.67(A) Jackson argues no final order under 2505.02; improper leave Leave improvidently granted; appeal dismissed
Validity of the trial court’s order on disclosure State argues secrecy justifies in-camera handling Court allowed only in-camera inspection, not direct disclosure Court order was not the issue; appeal limited to reconsideration, dismissal appropriate
Whether the trial court’s order affected finality of proceedings Order could affect defense/public interests Order did not disclose names to Jackson Not necessary to decide finality; improvident grant of leave controls

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Ford, 2006-Ohio-6961 (9th Dist. 2006) (whether leave to appeal suits R.C. 2945.67(A) in nonfinal orders)
  • State v. Rivera, 2009-Ohio-1428 (9th Dist. 2009) (discretionary appeal under 2945.67(A) for nonfinal orders)
  • State ex rel. Steckman v. Jackson, 70 Ohio St.3d 420 (1994) (public-records discovery exception authorizes appeal by leave)
  • State v. Ross, 2010-Ohio-6282 (Ohio Supreme Court 2010) (R.C. 2945.67(A) allows appeal of other decisions by leave)
  • State v. Keeton, 18 Ohio St.3d 379 (1985) (trial court discretion in granting leave to appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Jackson
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 7, 2011
Citations: 192 Ohio App. 3d 617; 949 N.E.2d 1070; 2011-Ohio-986; No. 09CA009618
Docket Number: No. 09CA009618
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In