State v. Hyche
265 P.3d 1172
| Kan. | 2011Background
- Hyche pled guilty to aggravated indecent liberties with a child under Jessica’s Law and received a hard 25 sentence (life with a mandatory minimum of 25 years).
- Hyche seeks parole eligibility after 20 years under K.S.A. 22-3717(b)(2) or (b)(5).
- The district court also imposed lifetime electronic monitoring, which the court later vacated as unauthorized.
- The victim was Hyche’s step-granddaughter, a 7-year-old, and the criminal act occurred in Hyche’s home.
- Hyche moved for a downward departure under K.S.A. 21-4643(d); the court denied the motion, and Hyche appealed.
- The court affirmed most of the sentence but vacated the electronic monitoring component.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parole eligibility under KSGA for hard-25 life sentence | Hyche: eligible for 20-year parole under 22-3717(b)(2)/(b)(5). | Hyche: rule of lenity warrants 20-year term. | Hyche not eligible for parole before 25 years. |
| Validity of lifetime electronic monitoring | Monitoring was imposed as part of the sentence. | Jolly prohibits lifetime electronic monitoring; not properly imposed. | Vacate lifetime electronic monitoring portion. |
| Downward departure from hard 25 sentence | Multiple mitigators justify a departure. | Court properly weighed aggravators and mitigators; no abuse of discretion. | No abuse; downward departure denied. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Cash, 293 Kan. 326 (2011) (hard-25 parole rule for off-grid life sentences)
- State v. Chavez, 292 Kan. 464 (2011) (parole and departures under Jessica’s Law)
- State v. Pace, 292 Kan. 937 (2011) (parole eligibility and sentencing guidance)
- State v. Mendoza, 292 Kan. 933 (2011) (departure considerations under K.S.A. 21-4643(d))
- State v. Jolly, 291 Kan. 842 (2011) (lifetime electronic monitoring deemed improper)
