midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
197 Ohio App. 3d 689
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Hunter was indicted on December 6, 2010, for conveying drugs of abuse into a detention facility.
  • During closing, prosecutor disclosed plea negotiations, after defense had argued possession is different from conveyance.
  • The court declared a mistrial and dismissed the case following the prosecutor’s statement.
  • The trial court found the statements amounted to prosecutorial misconduct and prejudiced the defendant.
  • The judgment dismissed the case without specifying prejudice or addressing retrial/double jeopardy.
  • Appellant State appeals, arguing mistrial improper and dismissal with prejudice instead of retrial.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Prosecutorial misconduct and mistrial Hunter Hunter Mistrial properly declared; prejudicial misconduct established
Dismissal without prejudice vs. with prejudice State State Dismissal presumed without prejudice; affirming no error in dismissal

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Glover, 35 Ohio St.3d 18 (1988) (great deference to trial court on mistrial decisions)
  • Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209 (1982) (fair trial focus, not prosecutorial culpability)
  • Dorr, 636 F.2d 117 (5th Cir.1981) (standard for evaluating prosecutorial misconduct in closing)
  • State v. Treesh, 90 Ohio St.3d 460 (2001) (touchstone: fairness of the trial)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Hunter
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 20, 2012
Citations: 197 Ohio App. 3d 689; 968 N.E.2d 585; 2012-Ohio-189; No. OT-11-006
Docket Number: No. OT-11-006
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In