History
  • No items yet
midpage
106 So. 3d 1038
La. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Howard assaulted Alyssa Balsamo in Swartz after confrontational contact following a breakup; Alyssa, Hannah Anderson, and Liz McEacharn were present; Howard is alleged to have choked, battered, and assaulted Alyssa and dragged Hannah during the incident; Alyssa suffered concussion and physical injuries; prior related domestic-violence incidents with Lora Wallace were admitted as 404B evidence under Prieur; trial included a Prieur hearing and the state sought to introduce 404B evidence to show a pattern of domestic violence; Howard was convicted of second degree battery (Alyssa) and simple battery (Hannah) and sentenced to consecutive terms (five years and six months) plus a lifelong restraining order; appellate review addresses admissibility of other crimes evidence, Brady material disclosure, continuance, and sentencing issues.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Admissibility of other crimes evidence under 404 B Howard argues 404 B was misapplied to prove propensity State contends Wallace acts show pattern/plan and are admissible Admissible as part of a pattern reducing propensity concern
Brady material nondisclosure Howard alleges suppression of exculpatory statements by witnesses State failed to supplement discovery; record inadequate to show prejudice No reversible error on record; issue not preserved and record incomplete
Whether denial of continuance/recess to obtain witness Smith was error Howard asserts counsel needed Smith for mitigating testimony Court did not abuse discretion; notice and scheduling appropriate No abuse of discretion; issue not reversible
Whether sentences are constitutionally excessive and consecutive Howard claims maximums are excessive for a first felony; requests concurrent terms Court properly considered history, gravity, and risk; consecutive terms justified Consecutive maximum sentences not abusive; not a reversible error

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Prieur, 277 So.2d 126 (La. 1973) (admissibility framework for other crimes evidence; notice and hearing required)
  • State v. Rose, 949 So.2d 1243 (La. 2007) (approval of 404 B evidence to show pattern of violent conduct toward intimate partners)
  • State v. Germain, 433 So.2d 110 (La. 1983) (probative value versus prejudice under 403 in other crimes evidence)
  • Old Chief v. United States, 517 U.S. 172 (U.S. 1997) (limits of prior-conviction evidence and balancing prejudice)
  • State v. Galliano, 839 So.2d 932 (La. 2003) (burden to prove other-crimes acts; admissibility standards)
  • State v. Johnson, 664 So.2d 94 (La. 1995) (consecutive-sentence justification and discretion)
  • State v. Bobo, 77 So.3d 1202 (La. 2011) (disclosure and procedural irregularities in discovery)
  • State v. Roussel, 381 So.2d 796 (La. 1980) (preservation and timing of objections under articles 841 and 841 A)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Howard
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Nov 14, 2012
Citations: 106 So. 3d 1038; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1455; 2012 WL 5500338; No. 47,495-KA
Docket Number: No. 47,495-KA
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Howard, 106 So. 3d 1038