State v. Howard
2011 Ohio 4754
Ohio Ct. App.2011Background
- Defendant Jeffrey Howard was indicted in Mahoning County for carrying concealed weapons following a May 10, 2009 traffic stop.
- Howard moved to dismiss arguing his concealed carry license should have been reinstated because of prior minor- misdemeanor dispositions and a suspension termination.
- The suspension notice was based on a charge of discharging a firearm while intoxicated; the charge was later amended to disorderly conduct and carrying a concealed weapon.
- Judgment entries showed Howard pleaded no contest to the minor offenses and the weapon was to be returned to him, with fines assessed.
- Howard entered an Alford plea to the indicted charge in 2010; the State agreed to stand silent at sentencing and the court imposed one year of community control.
- On appeal, Howard challenged the indictment as predicated on an incorrectly charged offense, seeking dismissal as a pretrial remedy.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the indictment was properly dismissed as predicated on an incorrectly charged offense | State contends the pretrial motion to dismiss sought a determination on guilt, not proper pretrial disposal. | Howard argues reinstatement of the license should have occurred, undermining the charged offense. | Waived review due to Alford plea; pretrial dismissal issue not reviewable. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Carter, 124 Ohio App.3d 423 (1997) (Alford pleadings treated as guilty pleas for waiver purposes)
- State v. Nguyen, 2007-Ohio-2034 (2007) (Alford plea does not preserve appeal of pretrial motions)
- State v. Bailey, 2004-Ohio-6427 (2004) (purpose of Alford plea to avoid trial consequences)
- State v. Brady, 2010-Ohio-2421 (2010) (Crim.R. 12(C) pretrial limits on evaluating trial issues)
- North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970) (plea to avoid risk; waiver of most appellate review)
