History
  • No items yet
midpage
2014 Ohio 1814
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant-appellant Horn was convicted by jury of grand theft of a motor vehicle, aggravated robbery with a firearm specification, and kidnapping with firearm specifications.
  • He was sentenced on October 31, 2008 to a total term of 14 years and six months.
  • The October 31, 2008 sentencing entry recorded conviction, sentences, consecutive terms, judge’s signature, and clerk’s time stamp.
  • A December 17, 2009 nunc pro tunc judgment corrected the entry to state the manner of conviction for Crim.R. 32(C) compliance.
  • Horn appealed the conviction; direct appeals were affirmed or denied by the state appellate court and Ohio Supreme Court declined jurisdiction.
  • On December 3, 2013 the trial court denied Horn’s motion for a final appealable order, which he challenges as improper under Crim.R. 32(C) and Baker.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether there was a final appealable order given multiple judgments Horn argues Baker requires a single document Horn contends there were three judgments and no final order No; October 31, 2008 entry was final and appealable; nunc pro tunc entry corrected form, not new order; res judicata applies to new challenges

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Baker, 119 Ohio St.3d 197 (2008) (four elements must appear in one document for finality)
  • State v. Lester, 130 Ohio St.3d 303 (2011) (nunc pro tunc corrections to satisfy Crim.R. 32(C) do not create new final orders)
  • State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St.2d 175 (1967) (valid, final judgment on the merits bars subsequent actions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Horn
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 28, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 1814; 13 CAA 12 0087
Docket Number: 13 CAA 12 0087
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Horn, 2014 Ohio 1814