midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2012 Ohio 3003
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Hopkins was cited for a marked lane offense on May 4, 2011, following a collision.
  • The citation incorrectly listed a May 19 arraignment; correction letter changed it to May 18, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.
  • Hopkins did not appear for the May 18 (or May 19) appearance nor pay the fine; no bench warrant issued.
  • On June 10, 2011, Hopkins sent a pro se letter contesting the citation, construed as a not guilty plea.
  • The trial court ruled the speedy-trial clock tolled from Hopkins’s May 18 appearance failure until June 9, 2011, and that only 26 days elapsed before his June 22, 2011 no contest plea.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the speedy-trial clock was properly tolled Hopkins’s failure to appear tolled under R.C. 2945.72(D) Clock should not toll without a bench warrant Tolled; 26 days ran before plea; claim meritless

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. King, 70 Ohio St.3d 158 (1994) (speedy-trial rights coextensive with constitutional protections)
  • State v. O'Brien, 34 Ohio St.3d 7 (1987) (statutory fast-track provisions aligned with constitutional right to trial)
  • State v. Sanchez, 110 Ohio St.3d 274 (2006) (timeliness and tolling considerations in speedy-trial analysis)
  • State v. Butcher, 27 Ohio St.3d 28 (1986) (tolling for defendant's neglectful delay)
  • Brecksville v. Cook, 75 Ohio St.3d 53 (1996) (strict construction of speedy-trial statutes against State)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Hopkins
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 21, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 3003; 11 MA 107
Docket Number: 11 MA 107
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In