midpage
2014 Ohio 2724
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Holmes pleaded guilty to four offenses: two counts of gross sexual imposition and two counts of importuning, all related to three victims on separate occasions.
  • The charges were felonies (fourth-degree for gross sexual imposition; fifth-degree for importuning).
  • The state anticipated a 24-month recommended sentence, with possible judicial release after six months.
  • At sentencing, the court imposed concurrent 12-month terms on each count, plus a consecutive term within the aggregate to reach 24 months total.
  • Holmes appeals, arguing the court failed to make required R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings before imposing consecutive sentences.
  • The appellate court ultimately reverses the sentence and remands for resentencing due to missing statutory findings in the sentencing entry and at the hearing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether consecutive sentences were properly supported. Holmes argues the court failed to make the required findings. Holmes contends R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings were not satisfied by the record. Consecutive sentences not properly supported; findings were incomplete.
Whether the sentencing hearing and entry contained all required findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). Holmes asserts the court did not articulate all statutory findings. State contends the record showed considerations of severity and recidivism. Requirements not met; remand for resentencing.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Verity, 7th Dist. No. 12 MA 139, 2013-Ohio-1158 (2013) (sufficient findings implied by court—recidivism and public protection; later formal finding supported proportionality)
  • State v. Kornegay, 7th Dist. No. 12 MA 10, 2013-Ohio-658 (2013) (adequate findings under 2929.14(C)(4) based on conduct during the course of multiple offenses)
  • State v. Esmail, 7th Dist. No. 11 CO 35, 2013-Ohio-2165 (2013) (insufficient findings where court only cited general sentencing statutes; not enough for 2929.14(C)(4))
  • State v. Power, 7th Dist. No. 12 CO 14, 2013-Ohio-4254 (2013) (no magic words required; must show actual findings)
  • State v. Bellard, 7th Dist. No. 12 MA 97, 2013-Ohio-2956 (2013) (requires indication of findings under 2929.14(C)(4))
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Holmes
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 19, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 2724; 13-MA-76
Docket Number: 13-MA-76
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In