History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Hodges
2014 Ohio 4690
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Hodges pled guilty to murder with a three-year firearm specification and related offenses; the murder, aggravated robbery, and improperly handling firearms in a motor vehicle were merged as allied offenses; the state proceeded to sentencing on the murder conviction; Hodges I reversed Hodges’ consecutive sentences for lack of proper R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings and remanded; at resentencing Hodges challenged the court’s findings and reliance on silence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court properly found R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings before imposing consecutive sentences Hodges argues the court failed to make required findings State contends findings were made and supported Findings satisfied Bonnell standard; proper findings supported consecutive sentences
Whether silence at resentencing improperly used to infer lack of remorse Hodges argues silence cannot be used against him State contends silence can be considered alongside prior statements Silence cannot be used to infer remorse; lack of remorse may be shown by prior statements; court did not rely on silence in isolation
Whether clerical omission warrant nunc pro tunc correction on Bonnell requirements N/A N/A Remanded to issue nunc pro tunc entry correcting sentencing record to reflect findings

Key Cases Cited

  • Bonnell v. State, 140 Ohio St.3d 209 (2014-Ohio-3177) (requires that findings be in the sentencing record; word-for-word recitation not required)
  • State v. Betts, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 88607, 2007-Ohio-5533 (2007-Ohio-5533) (silence at sentencing cannot be used against defendant; lack of remorse considered as a factor)
  • State v. Clunen, -, 2013-Ohio-5525 (2013-Ohio-5525) (courts may consider lack of remorse within statutory factors)
  • State v. Moore, -, 2012-Ohio-3885 (2012-Ohio-3885) (silence at sentencing not to be used to infer remorse in some contexts)
  • Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999) (penalty-phase silence; open question whether it informs remorse)
  • White v. Woodall, 134 S. Ct. 1697 (2014) (updates on to whether silence bears on remorse/sentencing)
  • State v. Hodges, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 99511, 2013-Ohio-5025 (2013-Ohio-5025) (Hodges I; reversal on lack of R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Hodges
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 23, 2014
Citation: 2014 Ohio 4690
Docket Number: 101145
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.