State v. Hidalgo
296 Neb. 912
| Neb. | 2017Background
- Omaha police received an anonymous Crime Stoppers tip that a Hispanic male called "Roberto" (nickname “Sporty”), an 18th Street gang member aged about 30–35, lived at a given Omaha address and possessed illegal firearms.
- Officers surveilled the address, observed Hispanic males on the porch, checked a white Nissan Sentra registered to Robert Hidalgo and Jacqueline Linares, and found utilities/mail linking the residence to Linares.
- Officers’ gang unit records identified Robert (born May 1987) as an 18th Street gang member with the nickname “Shorty.”
- A trash pull from the residence produced mail addressed to the location and marijuana stems/seeds/leaves.
- Based on the tip plus investigative corroboration, officers obtained and executed a warrant for the residence; they found firearms in the house, a firearm in an adjacent yard, and a firearm in the Nissan Sentra parked in the driveway. Hidalgo later admitted the gun in the car was his.
- Hidalgo (a prior felony accessory conviction) was convicted after a stipulated bench trial for possession of a firearm by a prohibited person and appealed, arguing lack of probable cause for the warrant and that the vehicle search exceeded the warrant’s scope.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether affidavit supported probable cause for search warrant | Tip was anonymous and unreliable; corroboration only confirmed innocent details; trash marijuana insufficient to make contraband likely | Police investigation corroborated key tip items (name, residence, gang affiliation, presence of Hispanics of relevant age, vehicle registration, mail, trash marijuana); totality supports probable cause | Warrant supported by probable cause under totality of circumstances; suppression denied |
| Whether vehicle parked at the property could be searched under the warrant | Warrant described only the house and did not list the vehicle, so search of Sentra violated Fourth Amendment | Vehicle was in driveway contiguous to the described premises; affidavit and no-knock language anticipated weapons in vehicles used in narcotics/gang activity; vehicle search fell within scope | Search of vehicle valid under the warrant; vehicle search upheld |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Hill, 288 Neb. 767, 851 N.W.2d 670 (2014) (sets Nebraska standards for probable cause review and four-corners rule)
- Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) (totality-of-the-circumstances test for informant tips)
- State v. Vermuele, 234 Neb. 973, 453 N.W.2d 441 (1990) (no requirement that the crime itself be fully corroborated to justify probable cause)
- U.S. v. Pennington, 287 F.3d 739 (8th Cir. 2002) (vehicles on premises described in a warrant may fall within the warrant’s scope when affidavit shows connection)
