850 N.W.2d 777
Neb.2014Background
- Hessler was convicted of first degree murder, kidnapping, first degree sexual assault on a child, and use of a firearm to commit a felony; sentenced to death.
- Direct appeal affirmed; Hessler later filed a first postconviction action alleging ineffective assistance and trial errors.
- District court held an evidentiary hearing only on whether trial counsel was ineffective regarding competency; denied postconviction relief.
- Hessler filed a second postconviction motion with 17 claims including mental competency and trial counsel issues; district court denied request for evidentiary hearing.
- Court held claims were procedurally barred because they were litigated previously or could have been raised on direct appeal or in the first postconviction action.
- Hessler also sought coram nobis relief; court concluded writ not available to correct errors of law or in the circumstances presented.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether second postconviction claims are procedurally barred | Hessler argues new grounds justify relief despite bar. | State argues claims were litigated or known and could have been raised earlier. | Procedural bars upheld; second motion denied. |
| Whether Martinez v. Ryan permits a evidentiary hearing in Nebraska | Martinez creates a federal safety valve to excuse defaults for ineffectiveness claims. | Nebraska legislature chose single proceeding; Martinez not applicable to state postconviction. | Martinez does not apply; Nebraska law enforced; no new hearing required. |
| Whether coram nobis relief was available | Writ could review factual issues not raised previously. | Coram nobis not available to correct errors of law or issues already litigated. | Coram nobis relief denied. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Hessler, 288 Neb. 670 (Neb. 2014) (primary postconviction appeal; procedural bars applied)
- Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012) (claims of ineffective assistance not raised due to counsel default reviewed; not adopted for state postconviction relief)
- State v. Ortiz, 266 Neb. 959 (Neb. 2003) (exception to procedural bar for certain new grounds in postconviction)
- State v. Ryan, 257 Neb. 635 (Neb. 1999) (procedural framework for postconviction relief and finality)
- State v. Suggs, 259 Neb. 733 (Neb. 2000) (prior postconviction standards cited)
