State v. Hess
2012 Ohio 961
Ohio Ct. App.2012Background
- Hess was indicted on 26 counts of Forgery, eight counts of Insurance Fraud, two counts of Perjury, and one count of Grand Theft.
- He pled guilty to Perjury, Grand Theft, and seven counts of Insurance Fraud, with the State dismissing the remaining counts and remaining silent on sentencing.
- Prior to sentencing, Hess moved to withdraw his guilty plea, which the trial court denied.
- Hess was sentenced to community control and ordered to pay restitution totaling $114,926.58 to five companies.
- Hess challenges the plea as not knowingly/voluntarily made, the withdrawal denial, rulings on suppression and dismissal motions, and the restitution order, on appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Was the guilty plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered? | Hess argues medication impaired understanding. | Hess contends drugs rendered plea involuntary. | Plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. |
| Did the trial court abuse its discretion by denying the motion to withdraw the plea? | Xie factors not satisfied; withdrawal warranted. | No abuse; competent counsel, full Crim.R. 11 hearing, fair consideration. | No abuse; motion to withdraw denied. |
| Did the trial court err in denying the motion to suppress evidence? | Probable cause for search lacking. | suppression denied despite lack of substantial evidence. | Guilty plea waived pre-trial rulings; no error prejudicial to voluntariness. |
| Did the trial court err in denying dismissal of counts for statute-of-limitations issues? | Counts should be dismissed for timeliness. | Plea waived these challenges; dismissal not error. | Plea waiver defeats challenge to suppression/dismissal rulings. |
| Was the restitution amount properly awarded? | Restitution payments align with victims’ actual losses. | Some awards improperly duplicative or to non-victims. | Restitution award supported by evidence and within court’s discretion. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Bowen, 52 Ohio St.2d 27 (Ohio 1977) (due-process requirements for knowing pleas; Crim.R. 11 substantial compliance)
- State v. Nero, 56 Ohio St.3d 106 (Ohio 1990) (substantial compliance standard for Crim.R. 11; totality of circumstances)
- State v. Stewart, 51 Ohio St.2d 86 (Ohio 1977) (requirements to inform rights before plea)
- State v. Xie, 62 Ohio St.3d 521 (Ohio 1992) (sufficiency of plea withdrawal considerations; factors for withdrawal)
- State v. Peterseim, 68 Ohio App.2d 211 (Ohio 1980) (judicial discretion in approving withdrawal of guilty plea)
- State v. Brown, 43 Ohio App.3d 39 (Ohio 1988) (credibility of witnesses in withdrawal proceedings; appellate review standard)
- State v. Kelley, 57 Ohio St.3d 127 (Ohio 1991) (waiver of appellate issues when plea entered)
- State v. Williams, 34 Ohio App.3d 33 (Ohio 1986) (restoration of victims; standard for restitution amount)
- State v. Warner, 55 Ohio St.3d 31 (Ohio 1990) (supporting evidence required for restitution determinations)
- State v. Wheeler, 2011-Ohio-3423 (Ohio 2d Dist. (Montgomery)) (reiteration of guilty plea waivers post-plea rulings)
- State v. Barrett, 2011-Ohio-2303 (Ohio 2d Dist. (Montgomery)) (plea waivers affect pre-trial rulings on appeal)
