History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Helt
35,238
| N.M. Ct. App. | Aug 17, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Helt was convicted in Lea County of aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and appeals the verdict on a speedy-trial claim.
  • The memorandum indicates an unpublished disposition and discusses preservation of the appeal a conditional plea claimed by Helt.
  • The court assumed, for purposes of argument, that Helt preserved the right to appeal the speedy-trial issue.
  • The record suggested an approximately fifteen-month delay from offense to trial, which the court characterized as potentially intermediate in complexity.
  • The panel concluded that even if the case were simple, the delay would exceed the threshold by at most three months, and the delay weighed only slightly against the state.
  • The court rejected claims of substantial prejudice or particularized harm due to the delay and affirmed the conviction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was Helt's speedy-trial right violated by the delay? Helt argued the delay surpassed the speedy-trial threshold. The delay should be treated as longer than allowed for a simple case, constituting a violation. No violation; delay only slightly favored the defendant and showed no particularized prejudice.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Rojo, 126 N.M. 438 (1999-NMSC-001) (complexity and record sufficiency govern review when record is doubtful)
  • State v. Manzanares, 121 N.M. 798 (1996-NMSC-028) (case complexity determined by district court familiar with facts and issues)
  • State v. Jim, 107 N.M. 779 (1988-NMCA-092) (burden on defendant to provide a record sufficient for review)
  • State v. Suskiewich, 363 P.3d 1247 (2016-NMCA-004) (fourth factor weighs slightly in defendant’s favor when no explicit trial demand)
  • State v. Garza, 146 N.M. 499 (2009-NMSC-038) (particularized prejudice required; without it speedy-trial rights not violated)
  • State v. Wilson, 147 N.M. 706 (2010-NMCA-018) (delay beyond guideline for simple case weighs only slightly against state)
  • State v. Samora, 387 P.3d 230 (2016-NMSC-031) (negligent or administrative delay must be considered; ultimate responsibility with state)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Helt
Court Name: New Mexico Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 17, 2017
Docket Number: 35,238
Court Abbreviation: N.M. Ct. App.