History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Hefflinger
2017 Ohio 7100
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • On Sept. 16, 2016 Suann Hefflinger rear‑ended a stopped school bus; she told officers she fell asleep after taking medication.
  • Officer Jared Oliver observed lethargy, disorientation, and knew Hefflinger from prior contacts; he found a prescription bottle with 15 clonazepam pills in her car (90 prescribed 2 weeks earlier).
  • At the hospital Hefflinger refused a urinalysis; a recorded conversation captured her admitting she knew she should not drive after taking medication and that she fell asleep.
  • Hefflinger pleaded guilty to assured‑clear‑distance, proceeded to a bench trial on remaining counts, and was found guilty of OVI (drug), refusal to submit to chemical test, and failing to stop for a school bus.
  • Trial court sentenced her to 120 days jail for OVI, merged/dismissed the chemical‑test count, and imposed fines on the traffic counts.
  • Hefflinger appealed, arguing (1) conviction against manifest weight, (2) insufficient evidence, and (3) ineffective assistance of counsel.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (State) Defendant's Argument (Hefflinger) Held
Sufficiency of evidence that Hefflinger was under the influence of a drug of abuse while operating a vehicle Officer testimony of impairment + admission she took clonazepam + pills found in car suffice without expert testimony State needed expert medical testimony or field sobriety tests to link clonazepam ingestion to impairment Conviction upheld: officer lay testimony plus evidence of clonazepam intake was sufficient (no expert required)
Manifest weight of the evidence Evidence (officer observations, recorded admission, pill bottle, bus driver testimony) supports conviction Conviction is against the manifest weight because no field tests or expert linking drug to impairment Not against manifest weight; appellate court defers to trial court credibility findings
Ineffective assistance — stipulation of medical records Stipulation was tactical and records were non‑prejudicial Counsel erred by stipulating to medical records Not ineffective; stipulation was reasonable and records contained no damaging information
Ineffective assistance — guilty plea to assured clear distance prior to trial Plea supported by evidence (she admitted falling asleep and bus driver saw no attempt to stop) Counsel should have preserved civil‑liability defenses via no contest plea; Crim.R.11 warnings were not given Not ineffective; plea did not prejudice civil claims and Hefflinger did not show the plea was unknowingly entered

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (Ohio 1997) (distinguishes sufficiency from manifest weight review)
  • State v. Williams, 74 Ohio St.3d 569 (Ohio 1996) (standard for sufficiency review)
  • State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (Ohio 1991) (Jenkins/Jenks sufficiency standard)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (two‑prong test for ineffective assistance of counsel)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Hefflinger
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 4, 2017
Citation: 2017 Ohio 7100
Docket Number: E-16-054
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.