History
  • No items yet
midpage
333 P.3d 410
Wash. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Russell Harrington was convicted of first degree kidnapping of his wife Michelle Harrington.
  • The couple had a history of marital discord and violence, with Harrington displaying a gun during the December 30, 2009 incident.
  • Harrington planned the abduction, manipulating schedules, cutting phone lines, and preparing the scene with a syringe, pills, duct tape, and alcohol.
  • The crime occurred after Michelle sought a divorce; Harrington claimed the act was to control or threaten, and he asserted diminished capacity at trial.
  • The jury was instructed on two alternative intents for first degree kidnapping and later found Harrington guilty; the court imposed a lengthy sentence.
  • Harrington challenged sufficiency of evidence and the constitutionality of the “extreme mental distress” standard; the court rejected both challenges.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence for first degree kidnapping Harrington argues evidence fails to show intentional abduction. Harrington contends only general abduction or lesser intent is proven. Evidence supported intentional abduction under alternative means.
Constitutionality/vagueness of extreme mental distress Harrington contends RCW 9A.40.020(1)(d) is unconstitutionally vague. Harrington argues ambiguity makes notice and enforcement improper. Statute not void for vagueness; applied to case, it provided minimal guidelines.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Garcia, 179 Wn.2d 828 (Wash. 2014) (defines extreme mental distress for first-degree kidnapping)
  • State v. Worrell, 111 Wn.2d 537 (Wash. 1988) (not unconstitutionally vague; terms like 'without lawful authority' valid)
  • City of Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171 (Wash. 1990) (requires minimal guidelines to guide enforcement; vagueness standard)
  • City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171 (Wash. 1990) (vagueness framework for criminal statutes)
  • State v. Williams, 144 Wn.2d 197 (Wash. 2001) (vagueness in mental health related statutes; distinction from 'extreme mental distress')
  • State v. Danforth, 173 Wn.2d 59 (Wash. 2011) (principles for evaluating vagueness and police discretion)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Harrington
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Washington
Date Published: Jun 17, 2014
Citations: 333 P.3d 410; 181 Wash. App. 805; No. 30834-1-III
Docket Number: No. 30834-1-III
Court Abbreviation: Wash. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Harrington, 333 P.3d 410