History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Hammond
313 Ga. App. 882
Ga. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Hammond bicycled at night in a high-crime area and violated traffic laws (one-way direction, no headlight).
  • Officer detained Hammond briefly to inquire about the headlight, identity, and potential drug involvement after observing nervous behavior.
  • Hammond provided name/date of birth but mis-stated age; no outstanding warrants were found, as there was no photo for ID confirmation.
  • Officer asked about drug paraphernalia and crack cocaine; Hammond admitted to crack pipe possession and later to crack in possession.
  • A struggle occurred when officer attempted to detain Hammond; Hammond discarded a pill bottle with eight pieces of crack cocaine and attempted to grab the officer’s gun.
  • Hammond was indicted on obstruction, weapon removal, cocaine possession, improperly riding/equipping a bicycle, and abandonment of a controlled substance; a motion to suppress was granted, but the trial court ruled Hammond was in custody under Miranda.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Hammond was in custody for Miranda purposes during the Terry stop. State argues detention during focus on drug inquiry did not constitute custody. Hammond contends custody existed without Miranda warnings. No custody for Miranda; detention was Terry-type and not custodial.
Whether the questioning related to drug possession exceeded the lawful scope of a traffic stop. State argues continuation of inquiry was justified by articulable suspicion. Hammond argues extended questioning violated stop parameters. Questioning about drugs within a valid, brief detention did not improperly extend the stop.
Whether suppression was improper because Miranda warnings were not given. State claims no custody, so no need for Miranda warnings. Hammond argues failure to warn violated custodial suspect rights. Trial court erred in suppressing; statements and evidence not suppressed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Lucas v. State, 284 Ga.App. 450 (2007) (non-custodial traffic-stop inquiry allowed without custody)
  • Black v. State, 281 Ga.App. 40 (2006) (limits on detentions during traffic stops; articulable suspicion)
  • Thomas v. State, 301 Ga.App. 198 (2009) (limits of investigative detention within traffic stops)
  • Wintker v. State, 223 Ga.App. 65 (1996) (custodial arrest analysis for Miranda relevance at roadside stops)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Hammond
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 3, 2012
Citation: 313 Ga. App. 882
Docket Number: A11A1724
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.