History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Haller
306 P.3d 338
Mont.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Haller was arrested for DUI on August 3, 2011 and the state filed a complaint after an affidavit of probable cause the next day.
  • An initial appearance occurred on August 4, 2011; a preliminary examination was scheduled but not held for reasons unclear in the record.
  • On August 23, 2011, the State sought leave to file an information in district court, supported by an affidavit of probable cause, which the court granted the same day.
  • Haller was tried by jury and convicted on February 29, 2012 of felony DUI and driving without a valid license.
  • On April 16, 2012, Haller moved to vacate his convictions alleging lack of an adversarial probable cause hearing within 48 hours and lack of evidence at the scheduled preliminary examination.
  • The district court denied the motion on May 4, 2012; sentencing occurred May 8, 2012 and judgment was entered May 29, 2012.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the delay to obtain a probable cause determination was reasonable Haller argues 19-day delay after initial appearance violated reasonable-time requirement. Haller contends a 19-day gap before leave to file information was not reasonable. Court declines to decide reasonableness of 19-day delay; focus is whether motion to vacate was proper.
Whether the 48-hour preliminary examination requirement affects vacatur when information filed later Haller asserts lack of adversarial probable cause hearing within 48 hours invalidates the process. State argues initial probable cause determination occurred promptly via affidavit and subsequent proceedings were proper alternatives. Haller’s argument conflates procedures; preliminary examination not required if leave to file information is used.
Waiver of objections by failure to raise pre-trial objections Haller did not timely raise the 19-day delay before trial. Waiver applies under §46-13-101; issue not preserved for appeal due to late objection. District court did not abuse discretion; objection waived.
Whether there was insufficient evidence of probable cause at a scheduled preliminary examination Haller claims no evidence established probable cause at the August 18, 2011 hearing. State could obtain district-court charges via leave to file information with probable cause affidavit; preliminary exam evidence not required. No failure; no substantiation in record that a preliminary exam occurred or was necessary.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Robison, 317 Mont. 19 (2003 MT 198) (review of a motion to dismiss in criminal cases as question of law)
  • State v. Gatlin, 353 Mont. 163 (2009 MT 348) (reasonable time standard under 46-10-105, MCA)
  • State v. Higley, 621 P.2d 1043 (1980) (reasonable time for probable cause determination)
  • State v. McElderry, 944 P.2d 230 (1997) (time limits after probable cause determination; use of leave to file information)
  • State v. Farnsworth, 783 P.2d 1365 (1989) (procedural flexibility in obtaining probable cause determinations)
  • State v. Strobel, 885 P.2d 503 (1994) (information supported by affidavit of probable cause; district court leave)
  • County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44 (1991) (probable cause determinations and timing in relation to Fourth Amendment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Haller
Court Name: Montana Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 23, 2013
Citation: 306 P.3d 338
Docket Number: DA 12-0472
Court Abbreviation: Mont.