History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Halderman
2025 Ohio 2253
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Shaun W. Halderman was charged with three counts of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor under R.C. 2907.04, all first-degree misdemeanors due to his age (18) and the minor victim’s age.
  • Halderman pled guilty to one count in exchange for the dismissal of the other two.
  • At the plea hearing, the trial court described the charge and potential penalty (up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine) but did not explain constitutional rights or the effect of the plea in detail.
  • Halderman was sentenced to 180 days in jail (90 suspended) and classified as a Tier I sex offender.
  • On appeal, Halderman argued that his plea was involuntary due to the court’s failure to comply with Criminal Rule 11(C)(2) and 11(D).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Applicability of Crim.R. 11(C)(2) & 11(D) Halderman: Court failed to advise of constitutional rights and plea effects per rules. State: Rules only apply to serious offenses or felonies. Crim.R. 11(C)(2) & 11(D) do not apply to misdemeanors like this; no advisement required.
Court's Obligation Under Crim.R. 11(E) Halderman: Failure to inform of plea’s constitutional waiver invalidates plea. State: Only needed to state effect (admission of guilt) for petty offenses. Court only needed to state that guilty plea = full admission; did not affect plea’s validity.
Notice of Sex-Offender Registration Halderman: Court failure to mention requirement invalidates plea. State: Not required for petty offenses; not in Crim.R. 11(E). No requirement to advise of sex-offender registration under Crim.R. 11(E).
Relevance/Distinguishability of Hawkins Halderman: Hawkins case required notice of sex-offender status. State: Hawkins involved felonies; different rule applied. Hawkins distinguished; only applies to felonies and Crim.R. 11(C).

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Ballard, 66 Ohio St.2d 473 (Ohio 1981) (outlining plea colloquy requirements for felony cases)
  • State v. Jones, 2007-Ohio-6093 (Ohio Ct. App.) (explaining court obligations in accepting misdemeanor pleas)
  • State v. Hawkins, 2013-Ohio-2572 (Ohio Ct. App.) (Crim.R. 11(C) plea advisement requirements for felonies)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Halderman
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 27, 2025
Citation: 2025 Ohio 2253
Docket Number: 2025-CA-5
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.