271 P.3d 892
Wash.2012Background
- Hahn asked to have a girl disappear or appear as if she never existed; he was charged with solicitation to commit first degree murder.
- While awaiting trial, Hahn discussed harming the complaining witness S.M. with inmate Livengood and expressed desire that S.M. disappear or be gone.
- Livengood recorded Hahn’s conversations; Hahn and an undercover officer Miguel discussed making S.M. disappear and be gone.
- Hahn told Miguel to deliver a discreet gift to make S.M. disappear; transcripts show Hahn wanting S.M. to be gone.
- The State charged Hahn with solicitation to commit first degree murder; Hahn requested a jury instruction on solicitation to commit fourth degree assault, which the court denied.
- Court of Appeals reversed, holding the evidence supported a fourth degree assault instruction; State sought review and this court granted review on that issue only.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entitlement to lesser included instruction | Hahn | State | Not entitled; evidence does not support only fourth degree assault |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Workman, 90 Wash.2d 443 (1978) (two-prong test for lesser included offenses)
- State v. Wilson, 125 Wash.2d 212 (1994) (common law definitions of assault and battery)
