State v. Group
2011 Ohio 6422
Ohio Ct. App.2011Background
- Scott A. Group appeals a Mahoning County Common Pleas Court post-conviction relief order in a capital case, challenging 13 grounds for relief and denial of discovery and an evidentiary hearing.
- The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed Group's death sentence on direct appeal; post-conviction petition followed years of procedural delays and counsel changes.
- The trial court granted summary judgment for the State and dismissed the petition without a hearing, later treating the amended petition as original for purposes of R.C. 2953.21.
- Group asserted ineffective assistance of trial counsel across 13 grounds, plus requests for discovery and an expert.
- The appellate court held discovery is not a right in post-conviction, denied hearings on the grounds, and found most claims barred by res judicata or lacking cogent evidence dehors the record.
- The judgment denying post-conviction relief is affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying discovery and an evidentiary hearing | Group | State | Yes, discovery denied or not warranted |
| Whether post-conviction claims were barred by res judicata or lacked cogent evidence dehors the record | Group | State | Claims mostly barred; no hearing warranted |
| Whether the petition could be reviewed in post-conviction despite delays and counsel issues | Group | State | Petition properly dismissed; no right to discovery or hearing |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. West, Ohio App.3d 3347 (7th Dist. 2009) (no right to discovery in post-conviction relief)
- State v. Calhoun, Ohio St.3d 279 (Ohio 1999) (standard for post-conviction relief; prejudice required)
- State v. Jackson, Ohio St.2d 107 (Ohio 1980) (burden on petitioner; evidentiary showing required)
- State v. Combs, Ohio App.3d 90 (1994) (evidence dehors the record; credibility considerations)
- State v. Cole, Ohio St.3d 112 (Ohio 1982) (pre-hearing dismissal when no substantive grounds)
- State v. Brady, Not listed in text (Not listed) (Not applicable)
