History
  • No items yet
midpage
2012 Ohio 330
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Grier was convicted after a bench trial of burglary (R.C. 2911.12(A)(2)).
  • The charged entry occurred at McMillian’s apartment while she and roommates were on vacation.
  • Police found a broken window, moved refrigerator, knocked-over trash can; landlord observed damage consistent with forced entry.
  • DNA from blood on the window matched Grier.
  • No one was present at the apartment when the break-in occurred; McMillian returned a week later to find no items stolen.
  • Court held Grier is guilty of the lesser offense, third-degree burglary (R.C. 2911.12(A)(3)), and remanded for entry of that conviction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the evidence proves presence or likely presence to support A(2) Grier argues no proof of someone present/likely present. Grier contends state failed to show likelihood of occupancy. Insufficient evidence to prove likely presence under A(2).
Whether evidence supports intent to commit a crime State presented circumstantial proof suggesting intent (criminal mischief/theft). Grier contends lack of direct intent evidence. Circumstantial evidence supported possible intent to commit a crime; conviction sustained for lesser offense?

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (1992) (standard for sufficiency of evidence.)
  • State v. Martin, 20 Ohio App.3d 172 (1983) (appellate standard for reviewing sufficiency.)
  • State v. Kilby, 50 Ohio St.2d 21 (1977) (definition of burglary elements.)
  • State v. Flowers, 16 Ohio App.3d 313 (1984) (inference of intent from act within structure.)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Grier
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 1, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 330; C-110240
Docket Number: C-110240
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Grier, 2012 Ohio 330