State v. Grega
2014 Ohio 5179
Ohio Ct. App.2014Background
- Grega was convicted by jury of robbery (felony) and petty theft (misdemeanor) from a department store in Ashtabula County.
- On remand after an earlier partial reversal, the trial court merged the offenses and resentenced on the robbery to three years while giving credit for time served.
- The sentence was again imposed after considering the record, statements, and the presentence report under the purposes and factors of felony sentencing.
- Grega argues the 36-month term is excessive and not supported by 2929.11/2929.12 factors; he asserts the sentence should be reduced.
- The appellate court ultimately affirmed the resentencing, finding no abuse of discretion given Grega’s extensive prior record and seriousness of the conduct.
- The procedural posture involves post-H.B. 86 standard of review under RC 2953.08(G)(2) for felony sentences.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the re-sentence to 3 years was an abuse of discretion | Grega argues the sentence is excessive given the acts | Grega relies on 2929.11/2929.12 to claim lesser sentence | No abuse; court considered seriousness and recidivism factors and did not abuse discretion. |
| Appropriate standard of review for the felony sentence | Grega contends applicable standard requires deference to the trial court | Court applied RC 2953.08(G)(2) post HB 86 | Standard properly applied; Kalish framework retained but HB 86 revived 2953.08(G) review. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Kalish, 120 Ohio St.3d 23 (2008) (establishes two-step review for felony sentences with possible de novo review and abuse standard)
- State v. Cornelison, 2014-Ohio-2884 (11th Dist. Lake No 2013-L-064, 2014-Ohio-2884) (HB 86 standard; still considers 2929.11/2929.12 factors; review not limited to mere discretion)
- State v. Arnett, 88 Ohio St.3d 208 (2000) (requires consideration of seriousness and recidivism factors without mandatory factual findings)
- State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1 (2006) (restructured sentencing procedure; non-mandatory findings; guidance on sentencing discretion)
