State v. Greer
309 Neb. 667
| Neb. | 2021Background
- Kenneth Greer pled no contest to second-degree assault; the State dismissed a DUI causing serious bodily injury charge as part of the plea.
- On November 6, 2019, Greer drove at high speed, fled the scene after an initial collision, then ran a stop sign and struck a van carrying a 6-year-old girl who suffered traumatic head and spinal injuries and became partially paralyzed.
- Greer’s blood alcohol content was .311; he had two prior DUI convictions, a felony possession conviction, a revoked license, and a history of unsuccessful probation.
- The presentence report concluded Greer posed a very high risk to reoffend, showed denial/minimization, and recommended a straight sentence of incarceration.
- The district court sentenced Greer to 19–20 years’ imprisonment on August 6, 2020.
- Greer’s first appeal attempt used an affidavit with an expired notary stamp and was dismissed; he timely filed a second, properly perfected in forma pauperis appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether appellate court has jurisdiction over Greer’s second appeal after dismissal of his first appeal | State: Jurisdiction exists because the second appeal was properly perfected within the statutory period | Greer: First appeal was not perfected (invalid poverty affidavit); dismissal was a nullity so the second appeal is timely and establishes jurisdiction | Court: Jurisdiction exists; first appeal was never perfected so its dismissal was a legal nullity and did not bar the second appeal |
| Whether the 19–20 year sentence was excessive / an abuse of discretion | State: Sentence within statutory limits; court considered PSR and appropriate factors; no abuse of discretion | Greer: District court failed to adequately consider mitigating factors (age, education, mentality, criminal history) and sentenced to fit the crime rather than the offender | Court: Affirmed; sentence within statutory limits and court considered the factors (no abuse of discretion); court need not recite each factor on the record |
Key Cases Cited
- Porter v. Porter, 959 N.W.2d 235 (2021) (appellate duty to determine jurisdiction)
- State v. Gray, 949 N.W.2d 320 (2020) (standard for reviewing alleged excessive sentences)
- State v. Melton, 953 N.W.2d 246 (2021) (in forma pauperis appeals are perfected by timely notice and proper poverty affidavit)
- L. J. Vontz Constr. Co. v. City of Alliance, 500 N.W.2d 173 (1993) (rule that dismissal of an appeal without merits can operate as affirmance—distinguishable where appeal was not perfected)
- In re Estate of Marsh, 17 N.W.2d 471 (1945) (same general rule regarding appeal dismissals)
- State v. McCulley, 939 N.W.2d 373 (2020) (sentencing court need not articulate consideration of every factor on the record)
- State v. Miller, 481 N.W.2d 580 (1992) (principle that an unperfected appeal is a nullity; "nothing comes from nothing")
